This commit changes gdb/version.in to 16.3.90.DATE-git.
This commit also makes the following changes in gdb/testsuite:
* gdb.base/default.exp: Change $_gdb_minor to 4.
Commit 5c89e5539a addressed a SVE/SME gdbserver
crash on gdbserver and added a gdbserver-side self test for a register cache
raw_compare function.
For the GDB 16 branch though, gdbserver's regcache doesn't yet have a
constructor taking a target description, so we need to explicitly initialize
the register cache before the self test can take place.
Also, the self tests are only built if we explicitly pass --enable-unit-tests
to configure. This build error should not manifest on a default build that
doesn't enable self tests.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32775
Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Commit 51e6b8cfd6 fixed a
regression for SVE/SME registers on gdb's side by using a <= comparison for
regcache's raw_compare assertion check. We seem to have failed to do the same
for gdbserver's raw_compare counterpart.
With the code as it is, I'm seeing a lot of crashes for gdbserver on a machine
with SVE enabled. For instance, with the following invocation:
make check-gdb RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-gdbserver" TESTS=gdb.base/break.exp
Running /work/builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp ...
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until function breakpoint
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until breakpoint set at a line number (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until file:function(6) breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until file:function(5) breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until file:function(4) breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until file:function(3) breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until file:function(2) breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until file:function(1) breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until quoted breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: run until file:linenum breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: breakpoint offset +1
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: step onto breakpoint (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: setting breakpoint at }
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break: continue to breakpoint at } (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_no_break_on_catchpoint: runto: run to main
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break_nonexistent_line: runto: run to main
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break_default: runto: run to main
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break_silent_and_more: runto: run to main
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break_line_convenience_var: runto: run to main
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break_user_call: runto: run to main
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_finish_arguments: runto: run to main
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: kill program
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: run to factorial(6)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: continue to factorial(5) (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: backtrace from factorial(5)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: next to recursive call (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: next over recursive call (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: backtrace from factorial(5.1)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_next_with_recursion: continue until exit at recursive next test (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break_optimized_prologue: run until function breakpoint, optimized file
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_break_optimized_prologue: run until breakpoint set at small function, optimized file (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: test_rbreak_shlib: rbreak junk
Adjusting the regcache raw_compare assertion check to use <= fixes
the problem on aarch64-linux on a SVE-capable system.
This patch also adds a simple selftest to gdbserver that validates this
particular case by simulating a raw_compare operation.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32775
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
This commit fixes PR gdb/32797, and pulls in just part of commit:
commit 6447969d0a
Date: Sat Oct 5 22:27:44 2024 +0300
Add an option with a color type.
to the gdb-16-branch.
This commit allows the escape sequences \x1b[39m and \x1b[49m, which
select the default foreground and background colours respectively, to
work correctly.
This fix is just a small part of the above commit. Only these two
changes are required to fix this bug. As we are currently preparing
for a 16.3 release, I don't think we should be pulling in the whole of
the above commit.
You can test this commit using:
export TERM=xterm-256color
gdb -q -tui -ex 'py print("normal\n\x1b[39mforeground default\n\x1b[0mnormal\n\x1b[49mbackground default\n\x1b[0mnormal\n")'
All of the output text should use the default foreground and
background colors.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32797
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Modifying inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp to use `bt -no-filters` produces
the following incorrect backtrace:
#0 inline_func () at .../gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:49
#1 normal_func () at .../gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32
#2 0x000055555555517f in inline_func () at .../gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:50
#3 normal_func () at .../gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 1: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 1
The expected output, which we get with `bt`, is:
#0 inline_func () at .../gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:49
#1 normal_func () at .../gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 1: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 1
The cycle checking in `get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle` relies on newer
frame ids having already been computed and stashed. Unlike other
frames, frame #0's id does not get computed immediately.
The test passes with `bt` because when applying python frame filters,
the call to `bootstrap_python_frame_filters` happens to compute the id
of frame #0. When `get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle` later tries to
stash frame #2's id, the cycle is detected.
The test fails with `bt -no-filters` because frame #0's id has not been
stashed by the time `get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle` tries to stash
frame #2's id which succeeds and the cycle is only detected later when
trying to stash frame #4's id. Doing `stepi` after the incorrect
backtrace would then trigger an assertion failure when trying to stash
frame #0's id because it is a duplicate of #2's already stashed id.
In `get_prev_frame_always_1`, if this_frame is inline frame 0, then
compute and stash its frame id before returning the previous frame.
This ensures that the id of inline frame 0 has been stashed before
`get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle` is called on older frames.
The test case has been updated to run both `bt` and `bt -no-filters`.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32757
