This commit changes gdb/version.in to 13.2.90.DATE-git.
This commit also makes the following changes in gdb/testsuite:
* gdb.base/default.exp: Change $_gdb_minor to 3.
Commit b5661ff2 ("gdb: fix possible use-after-free when
executing commands") attempted to fix possible use-after-free
in case command redefines itself.
Commit 37e5833d ("gdb: fix command lookup in execute_command ()")
updated the previous fix to handle subcommands as well by using the
original command string to lookup the command again after its execution.
This fixed the test in gdb.base/define.exp but it turned out that it
does not work (at least) for "target remote" and "target extended-remote".
The problem is that the command buffer P passed to execute_command ()
gets overwritten in dont_repeat () while executing "target remote"
command itself:
#0 dont_repeat () at top.c:822
#1 0x000055555730982a in target_preopen (from_tty=1) at target.c:2483
#2 0x000055555711e911 in remote_target::open_1 (name=0x55555881c7fe ":1234", from_tty=1, extended_p=0)
at remote.c:5946
#3 0x000055555711d577 in remote_target::open (name=0x55555881c7fe ":1234", from_tty=1) at remote.c:5272
#4 0x00005555573062f2 in open_target (args=0x55555881c7fe ":1234", from_tty=1, command=0x5555589d0490)
at target.c:853
#5 0x0000555556ad22fa in cmd_func (cmd=0x5555589d0490, args=0x55555881c7fe ":1234", from_tty=1)
at cli/cli-decode.c:2737
#6 0x00005555573487fd in execute_command (p=0x55555881c802 "4", from_tty=1) at top.c:688
Therefore the second call to lookup_cmd () at line 697 fails to find
command because the original command string is gone.
This commit addresses this particular problem by creating a *copy* of
original command string for the sole purpose of using it after command
execution to lookup the command again. It may not be the most efficient
way but it's safer given that command buffer is shared and overwritten
in hard-to-foresee situations.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
PR 30249
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30249
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
(cherry picked from commit b69378ced6)
The cooked index scanner has special code to handle forward DIE
references. However, a bug report lead to the discovery that this
code does not work -- the "deferred_entry::spec_offset" field is
written to but never used, i.e., the lookup is done using the wrong
key.
This patch fixes the bug and adds a regression test.
The test in the bug itself used a thread_local variable, which
provoked a failure at runtime. This test instead uses "maint print
objfiles" and then inspects to ensure that the entry in question has a
parent. This lets us avoid a clang dependency in the test.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30271
(cherry picked from commit b10f2cd3f3)
When building with clang 16, I see:
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/z80-tdep.c:338:32: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
info->prologue_type.load_args = 1;
^ ~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/z80-tdep.c:345:36: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
info->prologue_type.critical = 1;
^ ~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/z80-tdep.c:351:37: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
info->prologue_type.interrupt = 1;
^ ~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/z80-tdep.c:367:36: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
info->prologue_type.fp_sdcc = 1;
^ ~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/z80-tdep.c:375:35: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
info->prologue_type.fp_sdcc = 1;
^ ~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/z80-tdep.c:380:35: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
info->prologue_type.fp_sdcc = 1;
^ ~
Fix that by using "unsigned int" as the bitfield's underlying type.
(cherry picked from commit 07f2859348)
Change-Id: I3550a0112f993865dc70b18f02ab11bb5012693d
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30423
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
When building with clang 16, we get:
CXX gdb.o
In file included from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdb.c:19:
In file included from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/defs.h:65:
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/enum-flags.h:95:52: error: integer value -1 is outside the valid range of values [0, 15] for this enumeration type [-Wenum-constexpr-conversion]
integer_for_size<sizeof (T), static_cast<bool>(T (-1) < T (0))>::type
^
The error message does not make it clear in the context of which enum
flag this fails (i.e. what is T in this context), but it doesn't really
matter, we have similar warning/errors for many of them, if we let the
build go through.
clang is right that the value -1 is invalid for the enum type we cast -1
to. However, we do need this expression in order to select an integer
type with the appropriate signedness. That is, with the same signedness
as the underlying type of the enum.
I first wondered if that was really needed, if we couldn't use
std::underlying_type for that. It turns out that the comment just above
says:
/* Note that std::underlying_type<enum_type> is not what we want here,
since that returns unsigned int even when the enum decays to signed
int. */
I was surprised, because std::is_signed<std::underlying_type<enum_type>>
returns the right thing. So I tried replacing all this with
std::underlying_type, see if that would work. Doing so causes some
build failures in unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c:
CXX unittests/enum-flags-selftests.o
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c:254:1: error: static assertion failed due to requirement 'gdb::is_same<selftests::enum_flags_tests::check_valid_expr254::archetype<enum_flags<s
elftests::enum_flags_tests::RE>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE2>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE2, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::URE>, selftests::enum_fla
gs_tests::URE, int>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::check_valid_expr254::archetype<enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE2>, selfte
sts::enum_flags_tests::RE2, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::URE>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::URE, unsigned int>>::value == true':
CHECK_VALID (true, int, true ? EF () : EF2 ())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c:91:3: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_VALID'
CHECK_VALID_EXPR_6 (EF, RE, EF2, RE2, UEF, URE, VALID, EXPR_TYPE, EXPR)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/valid-expr.h:105:3: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_VALID_EXPR_6'
CHECK_VALID_EXPR_INT (ESC_PARENS (typename T1, typename T2, \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/valid-expr.h:66:3: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_VALID_EXPR_INT'
static_assert (gdb::is_detected_exact<archetype<TYPES, EXPR_TYPE>, \
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is a bit hard to decode, but basically enumerations have the
following funny property that they decay into a signed int, even if
their implicit underlying type is unsigned. This code:
enum A {};
enum B {};
int main() {
std::cout << std::is_signed<std::underlying_type<A>::type>::value
<< std::endl;
std::cout << std::is_signed<std::underlying_type<B>::type>::value
<< std::endl;
auto result = true ? A() : B();
std::cout << std::is_signed<decltype(result)>::value << std::endl;
}
produces:
0
0
1
So, the "CHECK_VALID" above checks that this property works for enum flags the
same way as it would if you were using their underlying enum types. And
somehow, changing integer_for_size to use std::underlying_type breaks that.
Since the current code does what we want, and I don't see any way of doing it
differently, ignore -Wenum-constexpr-conversion around it.
(cherry picked from commit ae61525fcf)
Change-Id: Ibc82ae7bbdb812102ae3f1dd099fc859dc6f3cc2
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30423
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
[ Changes in v2:
- rebase on trunk
Changes in v3:
- add test-case ]
We should exclude matches to the ending PC to prevent false matches with the
next function, as prologue_end is located at the end PC.
<fun1>:
0x00: ... <-- start_pc
0x04: ...
0x08: ... <-- breakpoint
0x0c: ret
<fun2>:
0x10: ret <-- end_pc | prologue_end of fun2
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Co-Authored-By: WANG Rui <r@hev.cc> (fix, tiny change [1])
Co-Authored-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> (test-case)
Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
[1] https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html
PR symtab/30369
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30369
