forked from Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
Mention process_stratum in inferior::priv comment
From what I can tell, inferior::priv is reserved for the process_stratum target. It seems to me that it has to be, because currenlty only such targets use it, and if a target at another stratum started using this field, then conflicts could occur. This patch documents this. Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ public:
|
||||
attach or handling a fork child. */
|
||||
bool in_initial_library_scan = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Private data used by the target vector implementation. */
|
||||
/* Private data used by the process_stratum target. */
|
||||
std::unique_ptr<private_inferior> priv;
|
||||
|
||||
/* HAS_EXIT_CODE is true if the inferior exited with an exit code.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user