Toolchain/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
Code Pull Requests Activity

gdb/testsuite: use a more unique name in gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp

Browse Source 
I see failures in this test, due to the function name "add" being too
generic, and unexpected breakpoint locations being found in my
libstdc++, such as (wrapped for readability):

    {
  	number="2.4",enabled="y",addr="0x00007ffff7d67e68",
  	func="(anonymous namespace)::fast_float::bigint::add",
	file="/usr/src/debug/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fast_float/fast_float.h",
	fullname="/usr/src/debug/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fast_float/fast_float.h",
	line="1815", thread-groups=["i1"]
    }

Change the test to use a more unique name.

Change-Id: I91de781be62d246eb41c73eaa410ebdd12633d1d
This commit is contained in:
Simon Marchi
2022-11-07 09:38:12 -05:00
parent b7096df235
commit 240e07bd94
2 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.cc
View File

@@ -16,13 +16,13 @@
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
static int
add (int a, int b)
a_very_unique_name (int a, int b)
{
return a + b;
}
static double
add (double a, double b)
a_very_unique_name (double a, double b)
{
return a + b;
}
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ add (double a, double b)
int
main (void)
{
int i = add (3, 4);
double d = add (3.0, 4.0);
int i = a_very_unique_name (3, 4);
double d = a_very_unique_name (3.0, 4.0);
return 1;
}

8
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp
View File

@@ -67,12 +67,12 @@ proc do_test { mi_version use_fix_flag expect_fixed_output } {
# Check the breakpoint-created event.
set pattern [make_breakpoints_pattern $expect_fixed_output 2 y y]
mi_gdb_test "break add" \
[multi_line "&\"break add\\\\n\"" \
mi_gdb_test "break a_very_unique_name" \
[multi_line "&\"break a_very_unique_name\\\\n\"" \
"~\"Breakpoint ${decimal} at.*\\(2 locations\\)\\\\n\"" \
"=breakpoint-created,${pattern}" \
"\\^done" ] \
"break add"
"break a_very_unique_name"
# Check the -break-info output.
mi_gdb_test "-break-info" \
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ proc do_test { mi_version use_fix_flag expect_fixed_output } {
# Check the -break-insert response.
set pattern [make_breakpoints_pattern $expect_fixed_output 3 y y]
mi_gdb_test "-break-insert add" "\\^done,${pattern}" "insert breakpoint with MI command"
mi_gdb_test "-break-insert a_very_unique_name" "\\^done,${pattern}" "insert breakpoint with MI command"
# Modify enableness through MI commands shouldn't trigger MI
# notification.