Fix context switch on SMP for ARM, PowerPC and SPARC.
Atomically test and set the is executing indicator of the heir context
to ensure that at most one processor uses the heir context. Break the
busy wait loop also due to heir updates.
Rename bsp_mm_config_table to arm_cp15_start_mmu_config_table and
rename bsp_mm_config_table_size to arm_cp15_start_mmu_config_table_size
to be in line with the other names in <bsp/arm-cp15-start.h>.
.. according to the maximum number of termios ports which is
8. Since LEON3 uses PnP to find how many UARTs there are
present we must make sure worst case work.
The current maximum of 4 free nodes caused for example the
GR712RC with its 6 UARTs to fail during devfs02 test.
On SMP rtems_interrupt_lock_context must be used. Most tests fail with a
NULL pointer exception when exiting, except on NGMP where main memory is
at 0x00000000.
The _CPU_Context_Restart_self() implementations usually assume that self
context is executing.
FIXME: We have a race condition in _Thread_Start_multitasking() in case
another thread already performed scheduler operations and moved the heir
thread to another processor. The time frame for this is likely too
small to be practically relevant.
Close the thread object in _Thread_Make_zombie() so that all blocking
operations that use _Thread_Get() in the corresponding release directive
can find a terminating thread and can complete the operation.
Add a chain node to the scheduler node to decouple the thread and
scheduler nodes. It is now possible to enqueue a thread in a thread
wait queue and use its scheduler node at the same for other threads,
e.g. a resouce owner.
Remove the scheduler parameter from most high level scheduler operations
like
- _Scheduler_Block(),
- _Scheduler_Unblock(),
- _Scheduler_Change_priority(),
- _Scheduler_Update_priority(),
- _Scheduler_Release_job(), and
- _Scheduler_Yield().
This simplifies the scheduler operations usage.
Suppose we have two tasks A and B and two processors. Task A is about
to delete task B. Now task B calls rtems_task_wake_after(1) on the
other processor. Task B will block on the Giant lock. Task A
progresses with the task B deletion until it has to wait for
termination. Now task B obtains the Giant lock, sets its state to
STATES_DELAYING, initializes its watchdog timer and waits. Eventually
_Thread_Delay_ended() is called, but now _Thread_Get() returned NULL
since the thread is already marked as deleted. Thus task B remained
forever in the STATES_DELAYING state.
Instead of passing the thread identifier use the thread control block
directly via the watchdog user argument. This makes
_Thread_Delay_ended() also a bit more efficient.
The _Scheduler_Yield() was called by the executing thread with thread
dispatching disabled and interrupts enabled. The rtems_task_suspend()
is explicitly allowed in ISRs:
http://rtems.org/onlinedocs/doc-current/share/rtems/html/c_user/Interrupt-Manager-Directives-Allowed-from-an-ISR.html#Interrupt-Manager-Directives-Allowed-from-an-ISR
Unlike the other scheduler operations the locking was performed inside
the operation. This lead to the following race condition. Suppose a
ISR suspends the executing thread right before the yield scheduler
operation. Now the executing thread is not longer in the set of ready
threads. The typical scheduler operations did not check the thread
state and will now extract the thread again and enqueue it. This
corrupted data structures.
Add _Thread_Yield() and do the scheduler yield operation with interrupts
disabled. This has a negligible effect on the interrupt latency.
These functions are used only via the function pointers in the generic
SMP scheduler implementation. Provide them as static inline so that the
compiler can optimize more easily.
This scheduler attempts to account for needed thread migrations caused
as a side-effect of a thread state, affinity, or priority change operation.
This scheduler has its own allocate_processor handler named
_Scheduler_SMP_Allocate_processor_exact() because
_Scheduler_SMP_Allocate_processor() attempts to prevent an executing
thread from moving off its current CPU without considering affinity.
Without this, the scheduler makes all the right decisions and then
they are discarded at the end.
==Side Effects of Adding This Scheduler==
Added Thread_Control * parameter to Scheduler_SMP_Get_highest_ready type
so methods looking for the highest ready thread can filter by the processor
on which the thread blocking resides. This allows affinity to be considered.
Simple Priority SMP and Priority SMP ignore this parameter.
+ Added get_lowest_scheduled argument to _Scheduler_SMP_Enqueue_ordered().
+ Added allocate_processor argument to the following methods:
- _Scheduler_SMP_Block()
- _Scheduler_SMP_Enqueue_scheduled_ordered()
- _Scheduler_SMP_Enqueue_scheduled_ordered()
+ schedulerprioritysmpimpl.h is a new file with prototypes for methods
which were formerly static in schedulerprioritysmp.c but now need to
be public to be shared with this scheduler.
NOTE:
_Scheduler_SMP_Get_lowest_ready() appears to have a path which would
allow it to return a NULL. Previously, _Scheduler_SMP_Enqueue_ordered()
would have asserted on it. If it cannot return a NULL,
_Scheduler_SMP_Get_lowest_ready() should have an assertions.
When trying to compile RTEMS for the Stellaris LM3S6965 board, I had an
issue of pppd.exe's .rodata section being too big to fit in the board's
memory image (region 'ROM_INT' overflowed).
This reverts commit d9ff8b3e68.
It is not that simple:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-06/msg00062.html
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 2014-06-06 13:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >Ok, so this "cmplwi cr0, rX, ppc_exc_lock_std@sdarel" is illegal,
> >since
> >ppc_exc_lock_std@sdarel is signed and the immediate is unsigned
> >16-bit? The
> >assembler doesn't issue a warning about this.
> >
> >Exists there a way to rescue this cmplwi hack without relaxing the
> >overflow
> >checks?
>
> Hm, sorry, it was surprisingly simple. This works:
>
> "cmplwi cr0, rX, ppc_exc_lock_std@sdarel@l"
>
> I was not aware that you can add several @ in a row.
That is the wrong thing to use here. sdarel@l translates to a VLE
reloc which applies to a split 16-bit field in VLE insns.
You want
cmpwi cr0, rX, ppc_exc_lock_std@sdarel
to properly compare a 16-bit signed number from sym@sdarel.
Note that the assembler does error if you write something like
cmplwi 3,-30000
or
cmpwi 3,40000
so what the linker is now doing is extending this behaviour to link
time.
See also
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-06/msg00059.html
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> I performed a git bisect and found this:
>
> 93d1b056cb396d6468781fe0e40dd769891bed32 is the first bad commit
> commit 93d1b056cb396d6468781fe0e40dd769891bed32
> Author: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue May 20 11:42:42 2014 +0930
>
> Rewrite ppc32 backend .sdata and .sdata2 handling
Hmm, I'm surprised that your git bisect found this patch. Was
_SDA_BASE_ set differently before this?
> 0x00000000000dfc00 _SDA_BASE_
> 0x00000000000d7f78 ppc_exc_lock_std
> 4b8: 28 05 00 00 cmplwi r5,0
> 4ba: R_PPC_SDAREL16 ppc_exc_lock_std
ppc_exc_lock_std@sdarel will be calculating 0xd7f78 - 0xdfc00
which is 0xf...fff8378, and that falls foul of
commit 86c9573369616e7437481b6e5533aef3a435cdcf
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Mar 8 13:05:06 2014 +1030
Better overflow checking for powerpc32 relocations
cmplwi has an *unsigned* 16-bit field, and we now check the overflow
properly.
I wonder how many more of these we'll hit, and whether the uproar will
be enough that I'll be forced to relax the checks?
The nanoseconds extension returned wrong values on secondary processors
since some of the global timer registeres are banked. Use global
variables instead.
