University of British Columbia. The BSP is for:
Yes, this is the "entry model" of a series of boards from Technologic
Systems. Costs <$200 I believe. They have a WWW page at www.t-systems.com.
I am letting them know about the availability of this BSP too.
the build-tools layout to simplify it.
This script reorganizes and simpilfies the build-tools subdirectories.
It moves all source-files and scripts to c/build-tools/. This will
enable use to use this directory directly to refer to the build-tools
instead of copying them around in a "preinstall" step in future.
However, RTEMS's autoconf Makefile.ins and *.cfg files are not yet
prepared to apply this approach and therefore require additional work.
This one is an enhancement to acpolish.
It replaces some Makefile variables by others variable in Makefile.ins
(tries to use unique name for some variables). It therefore eases
parsing Makefile.ins for further automatic Makefile.in conversions in
future.
To apply:
cd <rtems-source-tree>
sh <path-to>/rtems-rc-19990407-8.sh
./autogen
This is an attempt to work-around a couple of nasty bugs in librdbg's
Makefiles and configuration:
Configure and build RTEMS as below:
configure --enable-networking --enable-rdbg --target=i386-rtems
make RTEMS_BSP=i386ex
After a few minutes you will notice that building aborts in librdbg ....
Analysis:
1) librdbg is tried to be built, though librdbg is not supported and the
required directory hierarchy librdbg/i386/i386ex/ is not existant.
The cause for this is incorrect setting of HAS_RDBG in most
make/custom/*.cfg files (except pc386.cfg). At the moment all
custom/*.cfg files (except pc386.cfg) in general are required to contain
HAS_RDBG=no. However, having HAS_NETWORKING=no in most custom/*.cfg
files and the toplevel configure script suppress building librdbg for
all CPUs except of i386.
=> The i386ex BSP falls though this scheme and librdbg is tried to be
build (CPU=i386 and HAS_NETWORKING=yes).
2) The Makefile.ins below lib/librdbg in general support i386/pc386 only
and are not capable to be used for multiple CPUs or BSPs (RPCGEN
generates it's target and bsp-specific files into librdbg/, therefore no
other CPU or BSP can ever be built afterwards). This problem is hidden
until now, because only a single CPU/BSP pair (i386/pc386) is really
supported.
3) The Makefile.ins below lib/librdbg can delete source files due to
improper handling of source files (make clean removes the *.x files in
the source-tree when configuring inside of the source-tree).
The patch below tries to work-around these problems for the i386ex and
the pc386 BSPs. This work-around is rather fragile (it applies rpcgen
-D, I don't know how portable this is) and incomplete (all custom/*.cfg
except of pc386.cfg should contain HAS_RDBG=no), nevertheless it should
work.
FYI: I am not talking about using "make -C <dir>", which probably
is much faster on M$ hosts than RTEMS's implementation, but about
removing --enable-gmake-print support and to apply a variant of
automake's subdirectory.
Automake's subdirectory rule seems to be a little bit faster, but I
wouldn't bet on this.
Attached to this mail is my proposal.
After applying the patch, please run
cvs rm aclocal/enable-gmake-print.m4
./autogen
2) ./c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/go32/startup
> all: ${ARCH} $(SRCS) $(PGM)
> $(INSTALL_CHANGE) ${PROJECT_RELEASE}/lib
>
>
This also is very questionable, because it means "install
$(PROJECT_RELEASE)/$/lib to the void". I think, removing the
INSTALL_CHANGE is the right way to fix it.
1) ./c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/i386ex/startup/Makefile.in
> preinstall:
> $(INSTALL_CHANGE) ${IMPORT_SRC} .
>
> # ${CP} ${IMPORT_SRC} .
>
>
>
This fragment is broken, because IMPORT_SRC is always empty.
IMO, the fix would be to remove this fragment or to replace it with
test -z "${IMPORT_SRC}" || cp ${IMPORT_SRC} .
if an external shell variable IMPORT_SRC shall be supported by this
Makefile, which IMO should not be done.
This first one below looked like it only belonged in a
virtual memory environment. The second one was causing
problems without the PROVIDE() - I don't know why.
Installing of bsp_specs for aliased bsps is broken. Instead of installing
RTEMS_BSP_FAMILY/bsp_specs, RTEMS_BSP/bsp_specs was tried to be installed.
The patch below should fix this problem (tested with mips64orion p4600 and
p4650).
