Files
binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.go/methods.exp
Tom de Vries 552a161c8d [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.go/methods.exp with check-readmore
When running test-case gdb.go/methods.exp with make check we have:
...
(gdb) break main.T.Foo^M
Function "main.T.Foo" not defined.^M
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n^M
(gdb) XFAIL: gdb.go/methods.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at main.T.Foo
...
but with make check-readmore the XFAIL fails to trigger:
...
(gdb) break main.T.Foo^M
Function "main.T.Foo" not defined.^M
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.go/methods.exp: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at main.T.Foo
...

This happens because this gdb_test_multiple "maintenance print symbols"
regexp:
...
    -re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
...
matches the entire command output.

Fix this by adding the missing ^ at the regexp start.

Tested on x86_64-linux.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29064
2022-04-15 16:53:08 +02:00

104 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext

# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
# Copyright 2012-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Test various aspects of methods.
load_lib "go.exp"
if { [skip_go_tests] } { continue }
if { [support_go_compile] == 0 } { continue }
standard_testfile .go
if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile} {debug go}] } {
return -1
}
set bp_location1 {main.T.Foo}
set bp_location2 {main.T.Bar}
if { [go_runto_main] < 0 } {
return -1
}
set found_wrong_foo 0
set found_wrong_bar 0
gdb_test_multiple "maintenance print symbols" "" {
-re "^\r\n void main.Foo.N6_main.T\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
set found_wrong_foo 1
exp_continue
}
-re "^\r\n void main.Bar.pN6_main.T\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
set found_wrong_bar 1
exp_continue
}
-re "^\r\n void main.T.Bar\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
exp_continue
}
-re "^\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $gdb_test_name
}
-re "\r\n\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
exp_continue
}
}
if { $found_wrong_foo } {
# We have with gccgo-6/7:
# <1><553>: Abbrev Number: 21 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <554> DW_AT_name : main.Foo.N6_main.T
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
} else {
# We have with gccgo-8/9/10:
# <1><1e24>: Abbrev Number: 40 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <1e25> DW_AT_name : main.Foo.main.T
# <1e2c> DW_AT_linkage_name: main.T.Foo
# For reference: with go1.11.13:
# <1><6c46b>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <6c46c> DW_AT_name : main.T.Foo
}
if { [gdb_breakpoint ${bp_location1} message]} {
gdb_test "cont" "Breakpoint .*, ${bp_location1}.*" \
"going to first breakpoint"
}
if { $found_wrong_bar == 1 } {
# We have with gccgo-6/7:
# <1><528>: Abbrev Number: 19 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <529> DW_AT_name : main.Bar.pN6_main.T
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
} else {
# We have with gccgo-8/9/10:
# <1><6e4>: Abbrev Number: 24 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <6e5> DW_AT_name : main.Bar..1main.T
# <6ec> DW_AT_linkage_name: main.T.Bar
# For reference: with go1.11.13:
# <1><6c49a>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
# <6c49b> DW_AT_name : main.(*T).Bar
# It has been clarified in PR gcc/93866 that it's ok that symbols names
# diverge between gc and gccgo. So, we accept the main.T.Bar as valid.
}
if { [gdb_breakpoint ${bp_location2} message] } {
gdb_test "cont" "Breakpoint .*, ${bp_location2}.*" \
"going to second breakpoint"
}