forked from Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
673dc4a054
I see the following two fails on arm-none-eabi target, because argv[0] isn't available. print argv[0]^M $1 = 0x1f78 "/dev/null"^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/argv0-symlink.exp: kept file symbolic link name print argv[0]^M $1 = 0x1f78 "/dev/null"^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/argv0-symlink.exp: kept directory symbolic link name My first thought is to check [target_info exists noargs], and skip the test if it returns true. However, noargs is set in gdbserver board files, so argv0-symlink.exp will be skipped on gdbserver board file. The change is too aggressive. When the program is running with gdbserver, argv[1] to argv[N] aren't available, but argv[0] is. Fortunately, argv0-symlink.exp only requires argv[0]. argv0-symlink.exp can be run with gdbserver board file, as what we do now. What we need to check is whether argv[0] is available, so I add a new proc gdb_has_argv0 to do so by starting a program, and check argc/argv[0] to see whether argv[0] is available. Dan fixed the similar problem by checking noargs, which is too strong. https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-02/msg00398.html as a result, the test is skipped on gdbserver. This patch fixed it too. gdb/testsuite: 2014-10-18 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> * gdb.base/argv0-symlink.exp: Check argv[0] value if gdb_has_argv0 return true. * gdb.guile/scm-value.exp (test_value_in_inferior): Don't check [target_info exists noargs], check [gdb_has_argv0] instead. * gdb.python/py-value.exp (test_value_in_inferior): Likewise. * lib/gdb.exp (gdb_has_argv0, gdb_has_argv0_1): New procedures.