forked from Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
This commit removes some, but not all, uses of LA_PRINT_STRING. In this commit I've removed those uses where there is an obvious language object on which I can instead call the printstr method. In the remaining 3 uses it is harder to know if the correct thing is to call printstr on the current language, or on a specific language. Currently obviously, we always call on the current language (as that's what LA_PRINT_STRING does), and clearly this behaviour is good enough right now, but is it "right"? I've left them for now and will give them more thought in the future. gdb/ChangeLog: * expprint.c (print_subexp_standard): Replace uses of LA_PRINT_STRING. * f-valprint.c (f_language::value_print_inner): Likewise. * guile/scm-pretty-print.c (ppscm_print_string_repr): Likewise. * p-valprint.c (pascal_language::value_print_inner): Likewise. * python/py-prettyprint.c (print_string_repr): Likewise.