Files
binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.c
Tom de Vries 85819864f7 [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp with gcc 4.8.5
On powerpc64le-linux, using gcc 4.8.5, I run into:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: next (1)
next^M
11        c = vec_add (a, b);^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: next (2)
print/x a^M
$67 = {0xfefefefe, 0xfefefefe, 0xfefefefe, 0xfefefefe}^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp: print vector parameter a
...

Looking at the disassembly and the debug info, it's clear why there's
a FAIL.

The debug info says that the variable can be found at some stack location, but
the instructions don't seem to be writing there.

We can work around this by marking variable a volatile.  Likewise for b.

Note that marking the variables as volatile doesn't change the location
information.

Tested on power64le-linux.
2022-11-28 13:57:17 +01:00

42 lines
1.0 KiB
C

#include <altivec.h>
#include <stdio.h>
vector unsigned int
vector_fun (volatile vector unsigned int a, volatile vector unsigned int b)
{
vector unsigned int c;
a = ((vector unsigned int) vec_splat_u8(2));
b = ((vector unsigned int) vec_splat_u8(3));
c = vec_add (a, b);
return c;
}
int
main ()
{
vector unsigned int y;
vector unsigned int x;
vector unsigned int z;
int a;
/* This line may look unnecessary but we do need it, because we want to
have a line to do a next over (so that gdb refetches the registers)
and we don't want the code to change any vector registers.
The splat operations below modify the VRs,i
so we don't want to execute them yet. */
a = 9;
x = ((vector unsigned int) vec_splat_u8 (-2));
y = ((vector unsigned int) vec_splat_u8 (1));
z = vector_fun (x, y);
x = vec_sld (x,y,2);
x = vec_add (x, ((vector unsigned int){5,6,7,8}));
z = (vector unsigned int) vec_splat_u8 ( -2);
y = vec_add (x, z);
z = (vector unsigned int) vec_cmpeq (x,y);
return 0;
}