Files
binutils-gdb/opcodes
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00
..
2020-02-26 10:37:25 +10:30
2020-02-26 10:37:25 +10:30
2020-07-07 16:01:48 +03:00
2020-07-07 16:01:48 +03:00
2020-06-29 10:07:56 +09:30
2020-06-05 16:22:46 +09:30
2020-01-01 18:12:08 +10:30
2020-06-29 10:07:56 +09:30
2020-06-29 10:07:56 +09:30
2020-07-14 10:42:33 +02:00
2020-07-14 10:42:33 +02:00
2020-01-10 17:32:33 +10:30
2020-01-10 17:32:33 +10:30
2020-03-20 12:35:51 +10:30
2020-06-29 10:07:56 +09:30
2020-02-26 10:37:25 +10:30
2020-02-26 10:37:25 +10:30
2020-05-28 22:08:42 +09:30
2020-01-17 12:34:03 -06:00
2020-06-06 14:44:32 +09:30
2020-03-22 23:20:15 +10:30
2020-06-29 10:07:56 +09:30
2020-01-13 12:12:41 +10:30
2020-01-13 12:12:41 +10:30
2020-06-29 10:07:56 +09:30
2020-02-26 10:37:25 +10:30
2020-06-29 10:07:56 +09:30