Toolchain/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
Code Pull Requests Activity

2003-09-11 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>

Browse Source 
* gdbarch.sh (DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN): Rename STACK_ALIGN.
	* gdbarch.h, gdbarch.c: Re-generate.
	* infcall.c (call_function_by_hand): Update.
	* hppa-tdep.c (hppa_push_arguments): Update.
	* ada-lang.c (place_on_stack): Update.
	* xstormy16-tdep.c (xstormy16_gdbarch_init): Update.
	* sparc-tdep.c (sparc_gdbarch_init): Update.
	* m68hc11-tdep.c (m68hc11_gdbarch_init): Update.
	* hppa-tdep.c (hppa_gdbarch_init): Update.
	* h8300-tdep.c (h8300_gdbarch_init): Delete comment refering to
	stack_align.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cagney
2003-09-11 15:17:18 +00:00
parent f630a401b4
commit f27dd7fde7
13 changed files with 101 additions and 74 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
gdb/infcall.c
View File

@@ -689,12 +689,12 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
arg_type = check_typedef (VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE (args[i]));
len = TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type);
if (STACK_ALIGN_P ())
if (DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P ())
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this
stack_align code is really broken. Better to let
PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the stack in a target-defined
manner. */
aligned_len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
aligned_len = DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (len);
else
aligned_len = len;
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
@@ -732,10 +732,10 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
if (struct_return)
{
int len = TYPE_LENGTH (value_type);
if (STACK_ALIGN_P ())
if (DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P ())
/* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-22: Should rely on frame align, rather
than stack align to force the alignment of the stack. */
len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
len = DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (len);
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* Stack grows downward. Align STRUCT_ADDR and SP after
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code
is really broken. Better to let push_dummy_call() adjust the
stack in a target-defined manner. */
if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2))
if (DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* If stack grows down, we must leave a hole at the top. */
int len = 0;
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
len += TYPE_LENGTH (VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE (args[i]));
if (DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST_P ())
len += DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST;
sp -= STACK_ALIGN (len) - len;
sp -= DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (len) - len;
}
}
@@ -824,13 +824,13 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
handled any alignment issues, the code below is entirely
redundant. */
if (!gdbarch_push_dummy_call_p (current_gdbarch)
&& STACK_ALIGN_P () && !INNER_THAN (1, 2))
&& DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P () && !INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* If stack grows up, we must leave a hole at the bottom, note
that sp already has been advanced for the arguments! */
if (DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST_P ())
sp += DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST;
sp = STACK_ALIGN (sp);
sp = DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (sp);
}
/* XXX This seems wrong. For stacks that grow down we shouldn't do