Toolchain/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
Code Pull Requests Activity

Garbage collect deprecated_pc_in_call_dummy

Browse Source 
I noticed there are no users of deprecated_pc_in_call_dummy left in
the tree.

The last user was ARM.  Usage removed here:

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-03/msg00820.html

This deletes the function.

2013-02-01  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* dummy-frame.c (deprecated_pc_in_call_dummy): Delete function.
	* frame.h (deprecated_pc_in_call_dummy): Delete declaration.
This commit is contained in:
Pedro Alves
2013-02-01 19:58:04 +00:00
parent 8a92335bfc
commit c1f7d745c8
3 changed files with 5 additions and 36 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
gdb/dummy-frame.c
View File

@@ -47,40 +47,6 @@ struct dummy_frame
static struct dummy_frame *dummy_frame_stack = NULL;
/* Function: deprecated_pc_in_call_dummy (pc)
Return non-zero if the PC falls in a dummy frame created by gdb for
an inferior call. The code below which allows gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break
is for infrun.c, which may give the function a PC without that
subtracted out.
FIXME: cagney/2002-11-23: This is silly. Surely "infrun.c" can
figure out what the real PC (as in the resume address) is BEFORE
calling this function.
NOTE: cagney/2004-08-02: I'm pretty sure that, with the introduction of
infrun.c:adjust_pc_after_break (thanks), this function is now
always called with a correctly adjusted PC!
NOTE: cagney/2004-08-02: Code should not need to call this. */
int
deprecated_pc_in_call_dummy (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
{
struct dummy_frame *dummyframe;
for (dummyframe = dummy_frame_stack;
dummyframe != NULL;
dummyframe = dummyframe->next)
{
if ((pc >= dummyframe->id.code_addr)
&& (pc <= dummyframe->id.code_addr
+ gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch)))
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
/* Push the caller's state, along with the dummy frame info, onto the
dummy-frame stack. */