Toolchain/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
Code Pull Requests Activity

gdb: final cleanup of various gdbarch_register_name methods

Browse Source 
Building on the previous commits, this commit goes through the various
gdbarch_register_name methods and removes all the remaining 'return
NULL' cases, I claim that these either couldn't be hit, or should be
returning the empty string.

In all cases the return of NULL was used if the register number being
passed to gdbarch_register_name was "invalid", i.e. negative, or
greater than the total number of declared registers.  I don't believe
either of these cases can occur, and the previous commit asserts that
this is the case.  As a result we can simplify the code by removing
these checks.  In many cases, where the register names are held in an
array, I was able to add a static assert that the array contains the
correct number of strings, after that, a direct access into the array
is fine.

I don't have any means of testing these changes.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Burgess
2022-08-31 13:32:59 +01:00
parent 7ac20d65a8
commit 9b9e61c7cf
29 changed files with 66 additions and 146 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
gdb/hppa-tdep.c
View File

@@ -632,10 +632,8 @@ hppa32_register_name (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int i)
"fr28", "fr28R", "fr29", "fr29R",
"fr30", "fr30R", "fr31", "fr31R"
};
if (i < 0 || i >= (sizeof (names) / sizeof (*names)))
return NULL;
else
return names[i];
gdb_static_assert (ARRAY_SIZE (names) == hppa32_num_regs);
return names[i];
}
static const char *
@@ -667,10 +665,8 @@ hppa64_register_name (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int i)
"fr24", "fr25", "fr26", "fr27",
"fr28", "fr29", "fr30", "fr31"
};
if (i < 0 || i >= (sizeof (names) / sizeof (*names)))
return NULL;
else
return names[i];
gdb_static_assert (ARRAY_SIZE (names) == hppa64_num_regs);
return names[i];
}
/* Map dwarf DBX register numbers to GDB register numbers. */