Re: Add section caches to coff_data_type

Commit 0e759f232b regressed these tests:
rs6000-aix7.2  +FAIL: Garbage collection test 1 (32-bit)
rs6000-aix7.2  +FAIL: Garbage collection test 1 (64-bit)
rs6000-aix7.2  +FAIL: Glink test 1 (32-bit)
rs6000-aix7.2  +FAIL: Glink test 1 (64-bit)

Investigation showed segfaults in coff_section_from_bfd_index called
by xcoff_write_global_symbol due to the hash table pointer being
NULL.  Well, yes, the hash table isn't initialised for the output bfd.
mkobject_hook is the wrong place to do that.

	* coffcode.h: Revert 0e759f232b changes.
	* peicode.h: Likewise.
	* coff-x86_64.c (htab_hash_section_index, htab_eq_section_index):
	Moved here from coffcode.h.
	(coff_amd64_rtype_to_howto): Create section_by_index htab.
	* coffgen.c (htab_hash_section_target_index),
	(htab_eq_section_target_index): Moved here from coffcode.h.
	(coff_section_from_bfd_index): Create section_by_target_index
	htab.  Stash newly created sections in htab.
This commit is contained in:
Alan Modra
2023-05-18 11:10:38 +09:30
parent 4cb88cfae8
commit 0cc8cc5e6f
4 changed files with 57 additions and 84 deletions

View File

@@ -356,6 +356,21 @@ coff_object_p (bfd *abfd)
: (struct internal_aouthdr *) NULL));
}
static hashval_t
htab_hash_section_target_index (const void * entry)
{
const struct bfd_section * sec = entry;
return sec->target_index;
}
static int
htab_eq_section_target_index (const void * e1, const void * e2)
{
const struct bfd_section * sec1 = e1;
const struct bfd_section * sec2 = e2;
return sec1->target_index == sec2->target_index;
}
/* Get the BFD section from a COFF symbol section number. */
asection *
@@ -371,17 +386,23 @@ coff_section_from_bfd_index (bfd *abfd, int section_index)
struct bfd_section *answer;
htab_t table = coff_data (abfd)->section_by_target_index;
if (!table)
{
table = htab_create (10, htab_hash_section_target_index,
htab_eq_section_target_index, NULL);
if (table == NULL)
return bfd_und_section_ptr;
coff_data (abfd)->section_by_target_index = table;
}
if (htab_elements (table) == 0)
{
answer = abfd->sections;
while (answer)
for (answer = abfd->sections; answer; answer = answer->next)
{
void **slot = htab_find_slot (table, answer, INSERT);
if (slot == NULL)
return bfd_und_section_ptr;
*slot = answer;
answer = answer->next;
}
}
@@ -392,14 +413,16 @@ coff_section_from_bfd_index (bfd *abfd, int section_index)
if (answer != NULL)
return answer;
answer = abfd->sections;
while (answer)
{
if (answer->target_index == section_index)
/* Cover the unlikely case of sections added after the first call to
this function. */
for (answer = abfd->sections; answer; answer = answer->next)
if (answer->target_index == section_index)
{
void **slot = htab_find_slot (table, answer, INSERT);
if (slot != NULL)
*slot = answer;
return answer;
answer = answer->next;
}
}
/* We should not reach this point, but the SCO 3.2v4 /lib/libc_s.a
has a bad symbol table in biglitpow.o. */