>> >>There is a 30 day error in _TOD_Days_since_last_leap_year[2..3]
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >What's the condition to hit this error?
>> >Every year 4n+2 and 4n+3 ?
>> >(i.e. 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003, ...)
>> >
>> OK: 96 97 00 01 04 05 ...
>> Bad: 98 99 02 03 06 07 ...
There is also a problem in newlib 1.7.x reported at the same time:
>> I found another, that would strike only on 2/29/2000, or other leapyears.
>> Only a problem on 1 day.
>>
>> Joel: FYI, there is a bug in Newlib localtime.c, localtime or (_tm_time).
>> Ours is modified for dst and timezones, but the bug was in original source.
>> I have not looked at the latest public source (nor do I know where to find
>> it).
The definition of "BEGIN_DATA" should not be null; should be ".data".
Also, the definition of "BEGIN_BSS" should be ".bss". For this error,
the compiled object has codes that write on the text segment area.
It is fatal when the code runs on ROM.
in the unix port idle thread task. This should keep the entire application
from blocking when any component does a blocking application. Also added
TOD_MICROSECONDS_TO_TICKS.
GNU autoconf. This is the first large step in allowing an RTEMS
user to perform a one-tree build (per crossgcc FAQ) including RTEMS
in the build process. With this change RTEMS is configured in
built in the same style as the GNU tools, yet retains the basic
structure of its traditional Makefiles (ala Tony Bennett).
Jiri Gaisler (jgais@wd.estec.esa.nl) deserves (and received)
a big thank you for doing this.
There are still issues to be resolved but as of this commit, all target
which can be built on a linux host have been using a modified version
of the source Jiri submitted. This source was merged and most targets
built in the tree before this commit.
There are some issues which remain to be resolved but they are primarily
related to host OS dependencies, script issues, the use of gawk
for hack_specs, and the dependence on gcc snapshots. These will
be resolved.
argument indicates whether the task is to be placed at the head or tail of
its priority fifo when it is lowering its own priority. POSIX normally
follows the RTEMS API conventions but GNAT expects that all lowering of
a task's priority by the task itself will result in being placed at the
head of the priority FIFO. Normally, this would only occur as the result
of lose of inherited priority.
