I've gone through and cleaned up the TFTP driver so that it fits
into the libio system. Here's the comment from the new driver:
/*
* Usage:
*
* To open `/bootfiles/image' on `hostname' for reading:
* fd = open ("/TFTP/hostname/bootfiles/image", O_RDONLY);
*
* The `hostname' can be a symbolic name or four
* dot-separated decimal values.
*
* To open a file on the host which supplied the BOOTP
* information just leave the `hostname' part empty:
* fd = open ("/TFTP//bootfiles/image", O_RDONLY);
*
*/
You can `fopen' TFTP files the same way:
fp = fopen (fullname, "r");
nread = fread (cbuf, sizeof cbuf[0], sizeof cbuf, fp);
The diff's are included below. I've also modified the TFTP demo
program and the bootstrap PROM example. They should be on my ftp
site `soon'.
The one thing I don't like is the way I had to do an end-run on the
libio routines to get errno passed back from my driver to the
application (since there are some errno codes that don't map to RTEMS
status codes). My approach was to set errno in the driver and have
the driver routine return an RTEMS status code that I `know' isn't in
the errno_assoc[] in libio.c.
Perhaps there should be an RTEMS_TRANPARENT_ERRNO status code (or
something similar) which driver routines could return to indicate
that the driver routine has set errno and that the libio routines
shouldn't attempt to map the returned status code to errno.
Actually, I think the entire I/O system needs looking at -- as
you've already mentioned. The hacks I've dropped in to syscalls.c to
make fstat work, for example, are *not* shining examples of good
code......
> RTEMS is under CVS control and has been since rtems 3.1.16 which was
> around May 1995. So I just to add the $Id$. If you notice other files
> with missing $Id$'s let me know. I try to keep w\up with it.
Now that you have asked -- I'll attach a list of files lacking an RCS-Id to
this mail. This list has been generated by a little sh-script I'll also
enclose.
>> >>There is a 30 day error in _TOD_Days_since_last_leap_year[2..3]
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >What's the condition to hit this error?
>> >Every year 4n+2 and 4n+3 ?
>> >(i.e. 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003, ...)
>> >
>> OK: 96 97 00 01 04 05 ...
>> Bad: 98 99 02 03 06 07 ...
There is also a problem in newlib 1.7.x reported at the same time:
>> I found another, that would strike only on 2/29/2000, or other leapyears.
>> Only a problem on 1 day.
>>
>> Joel: FYI, there is a bug in Newlib localtime.c, localtime or (_tm_time).
>> Ours is modified for dst and timezones, but the bug was in original source.
>> I have not looked at the latest public source (nor do I know where to find
>> it).
for GNAT. It was the number of Ada tasks when in fact the run-time
only required a single key.
Also added the CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_FAKE_ADA_TASKS constant to account
for resources allocated for each non-Ada task/thread which invokes
the Ada run-time implicitly through an Ada call.
