to address m68k-rtemself for the MVME167.
Here is the rtems patch I promissed you a long time ago to enable ELF
with m68k. The target name I selected is m68k-rtemself. It preserves the
m68k-rtems COFF target, and is parterned after the other ELF/COFF dual
targets.
The mvme167.cfg file causes the -qelf flag to be used during compilation
if the name of the compiler contains rtemself. This flag is used in the
bsp_specs file to select the elflinkcmds file rather than the linkcmds
file. The former is for ELF, the latter for COFF.
Some patches are required to the mc68040 FPSP code. Some of the
assembler files contain instructions that were rejected by the
m68k-rtemself-as assembler. This is a minor bug in the m68k ELF
assembler, I think.
boot_card() and main() into separate files to ease configuration
of other packages. This was a big step in the way to build TCL,
ncurses, and zlib for RTEMS.
> 5) rtems-rc-19990202-1.diff/reorg-install.sh
>
> reorg-install.sh fixes a Makefile variable name clash of RTEMS
> configuration files and automake/autoconf standards.
> Until now, RTEMS used $(INSTALL) for install-if-change. Automake and
> autoconf use $(INSTALL) for a bsd-compatible install. As
> install-if-change and bsd-install are not compatible, I renamed all
> references to install-if-changed to $(INSTALL_CHANGED) and used
> $(INSTALL) for bsd-install (==automake/autoconf standard). When
> automake will be introduced install-if-change will probably be replaced
> by $(INSTALL) and therefore will slowly vanish. For the moment, this
> patch fixes a very nasty problem which prevents adding any automake file
> until now (There are still more).
This problem should and likely was occurring with other BSPs. This is from
Chris' email:
I had a look in the psim bsp for the older snapshot I have and it looks
like you are using the `libbsp/shared/main.c' and this is known to work.
I have just built the powerpc tools, and compiled the bsp. I have not
added the linker command file patch so got the list of linker warnings.
It looks to me like a compiler bug. The `main' call is being inlined and
when that happens the special code to call `__eabi' is not being added
to the inlined version. I have attached a patch which places `main'
after `boot_card' and a call to main is now generated. I have not tested
it but it should work. I also include a dump of `boot_card' and `main'
showing the bug.
overhaul of the RTEMS system call interface. This base file system is
the "In-Memory File System" aka IMFS.
The design and implementation was done by the following people:
+ Joel Sherrill (joel@OARcorp.com)
+ Jennifer Averett (jennifer@OARcorp.com)
+ Steve "Mr Mount" Salitasc (salitasc@OARcorp.com)
+ Kerwin Wade (wade@OARcorp.com)
PROBLEMS
========
+ It is VERY likely that merging this will break the UNIX port. This
can/will be fixed.
+ There is likely some reentrancy/mutual exclusion needed.
+ Eventually, there should be a "mini-IMFS" description table to
eliminate links, symlinks, etc to save memory. All you need to
have "classic RTEMS" functionality is technically directories
and device IO. All the rest could be left out to save memory.
code in each BSP's bspstart.c. These changes were:
+ confdefs.h now knows libio's semaphore requirements
+ shared/main.c now copies Configuration to BSP_Configuration
+ shared/main.c fills in the Cpu_table with default values
This removed the need for rtems_libio_config() and the constant
BSP_LIBIO_MAX_FDS in every BSP. Plus now the maximum number of open
files can now be set on the gcc command line.
based on the GNU tools. This usually involved correcting the
type of bsp_start(), bsp_cleanup(), adjusting the start code to
call the right start routine (the shared boot_card()), and then
removing code from bsp_start() which was performed in the new
boot_card()/main() path.
