RTOS/rtems
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Imagelibrary/rtems
Code Pull Requests Activity

+ Removed name validation code (this was already done in nametoid.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jennifer Averett
2000-01-12 18:40:18 +00:00
parent c1d2cc9ee7
commit 399ba0690c
2 changed files with 12 additions and 82 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

41
c/src/exec/posix/src/mqueuecreatesupp.c
View File

@@ -81,20 +81,6 @@ int _POSIX_Message_queue_Create_support(
}
#endif
if ( name ) {
if( strlen(name) > PATH_MAX ) { /* XXX - on non-null terminated name? */
_Thread_Enable_dispatch();
set_errno_and_return_minus_one( ENAMETOOLONG );
}
/*
* XXX Greater than NAME_MAX while POSIX_NO_TRUNC in effect.
* XXX Error description in POSIX book different for mq_open and mq_unlink
* Why???
*/
}
the_mq = _POSIX_Message_queue_Allocate();
if ( !the_mq ) {
_Thread_Enable_dispatch();
@@ -103,40 +89,19 @@ int _POSIX_Message_queue_Create_support(
the_mq->process_shared = pshared;
the_mq->oflag = oflag;
if ( name ) {
the_mq->named = TRUE;
the_mq->open_count = 1;
the_mq->linked = TRUE;
}
else {
the_mq->named = FALSE;
}
if ( oflag & O_NONBLOCK )
the_mq->blocking = FALSE;
else
the_mq->blocking = TRUE;
/* XXX
*
* Note that this should be based on the current scheduling policy.
* Note that thread blocking discipline should be based on the
* current scheduling policy.
*/
/* XXX
*
* Message and waiting disciplines are not distinguished.
*/
/*
the_mq_attr->message_discipline = CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
the_mq_attr->waiting_discipline = CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
*/
the_mq->Message_queue.Attributes.discipline =
CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
the_mq_attr = &the_mq->Message_queue.Attributes;
the_mq_attr->discipline = CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
if ( ! _CORE_message_queue_Initialize(
&the_mq->Message_queue,

41
cpukit/posix/src/mqueuecreatesupp.c
View File

@@ -81,20 +81,6 @@ int _POSIX_Message_queue_Create_support(
}
#endif
if ( name ) {
if( strlen(name) > PATH_MAX ) { /* XXX - on non-null terminated name? */
_Thread_Enable_dispatch();
set_errno_and_return_minus_one( ENAMETOOLONG );
}
/*
* XXX Greater than NAME_MAX while POSIX_NO_TRUNC in effect.
* XXX Error description in POSIX book different for mq_open and mq_unlink
* Why???
*/
}
the_mq = _POSIX_Message_queue_Allocate();
if ( !the_mq ) {
_Thread_Enable_dispatch();
@@ -103,40 +89,19 @@ int _POSIX_Message_queue_Create_support(
the_mq->process_shared = pshared;
the_mq->oflag = oflag;
if ( name ) {
the_mq->named = TRUE;
the_mq->open_count = 1;
the_mq->linked = TRUE;
}
else {
the_mq->named = FALSE;
}
if ( oflag & O_NONBLOCK )
the_mq->blocking = FALSE;
else
the_mq->blocking = TRUE;
/* XXX
*
* Note that this should be based on the current scheduling policy.
* Note that thread blocking discipline should be based on the
* current scheduling policy.
*/
/* XXX
*
* Message and waiting disciplines are not distinguished.
*/
/*
the_mq_attr->message_discipline = CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
the_mq_attr->waiting_discipline = CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
*/
the_mq->Message_queue.Attributes.discipline =
CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
the_mq_attr = &the_mq->Message_queue.Attributes;
the_mq_attr->discipline = CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
if ( ! _CORE_message_queue_Initialize(
&the_mq->Message_queue,