- primitive lfs_rbyd_fetch
- primitive lfs_rbyd_commit
- tag reading/progging and encoding machinery
The tag encoding scheme here uses pairs of leb128s, encoding either
a normal tag:
iiii iiiiiii iiiiiTT TTTTTTt ttttt0v
^--------^------^-^- 16-bit id
'------|-|- 8-bit type2
'-|- 6-bit type1
'- valid bit
llll lllllll lllllll lllllll lllllll
^- n-bit length
Or an alt pointer:
wwww wwwwwww wwwwwww wwwwwww wwwcd1v
^^^-^- 28-bit weight
'|-|- color bit
'-|- direction bit
'- valid bit
jjjj jjjjjjj jjjjjjj jjjjjjj jjjjjjj
^- n-bit jump
Note that two bits overlap the alt pointer dir/color encoding, this
is actually not a problem at all since some tags (crcs/fcrcs) don't
participate in the rbyd tree and can use these bits.
There's a number of benefits to using leb128s, which should probably
be written about, most notably is the abstraction of the device's
word-size. The "n-bits" above can be whatever word size works on the
device, trading off code-size for storage capabilities without breaking
compatibility with other devices. This will eventually be negotiated via
the superblock.
crc32c, with a polynomial of 0x11edc6f41, is generally numerically superior
to the more common crc32 standard. Catching more bit errors across
a wider range of message messages (except 2-bit errors) without any changes
to the underlying algorithm.
Philip Koopman has a large body of work exploring optimal polynomials here:
http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/crc/crc32.html
And from his experiments we know the maximum message size where we can
still detect a given number of bit errors for each polynomial:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
crc32 0x104c11db7 = ∞ 4294967263 91607 2974 268 171 91 57 34 21 12 10 10 10 - - -
crc32c 0x11edc6f41 = ∞ 2147483615 2147483615 5243 5243 177 177 47 47 20 20 8 8 6 6 1 1
So really crc32c should be prefered where possible. Koopman also has
alternative polynomials with slightly different properties, but crc32c
is already popular enough to have a decent amount of hardware support.
---
Another nice feature of crc32c is that its polynomial has even parity.
It turns out that even-parity polynomials give us the nifty property
parity(crc(m)) == parity(m).
A quick proof:
crc(m) = m(x) x^|P|-1 mod P(x)
parity(m) = m(x) x mod x+1
though note: x mod x+1 = 1, by hand
so:
parity(m) = m(x)*1 mod x+1
= m(x) mod x+1
solving for parity(crc(m)):
parity(crc(m)) = (m(x) x^|P|-1 mod P(x)) mod x+1
note: (a mod b) mod c = a mod c, if c divides b,
aka (a mod b) mod c = a mod c, if b mod c = 0
so if P(x) mod x+1 = 0,
aka if parity(P) = 0:
parity(crc(m)) = m(x) x^|P|-1 mod x+1
but, like before: x^|P|-1 mod x+1 = 1, by hand
so:
parity(crc(m)) = m(x)*1 mod x+1
= m(x) mod x+1
= parity(m)
so if parity(P) = 0:
parity(crc(m)) = parity(m)
This has the potential to replace the 1-bit counter in the metadata tags
with a more general solution that doesn't require extra state.
In looking at the common CRC APIs out there, this seemed the most
common. At least more common than the current modified-in-place pointer
API. It also seems to have a slightly better code footprint. I'm blaming
pointer optimization issues.
One downside is that lfs_crc can't report errors, however it was already
assumed that lfs_crc can not error.
Suggested by sn00pster, LFS_CONFIG is an opt-in user provided
configuration file that will override the util implementation in
lfs_util.h. This is useful for allowing system-specific overrides
without needing to rely on git merges or other forms of patching
for updates.
Before, the littlefs relied on the underlying block device
to report corruption that occurs when writing data to disk.
This requirement is easy to miss or implement incorrectly, since
the error detection is only required when a block becomes corrupted,
which is very unlikely to happen until late in the block device's
lifetime.
The littlefs can detect corruption itself by reading back written data.
This requires a bit of care to reuse the available buffers, and may rely
on checksums to avoid additional RAM requirements.
This does have a runtime penalty with the extra read operations, but
should make the littlefs much more robust to different implementations.
Adopted buffer followed by size. The other order was original
chosen due to some other functions with a more complicated
parameter list.
This convention is important, as the bd api is one of the main
apis facing porting efforts.
After quite a bit of prototyping, settled on the following functions:
- lfs_dir_alloc - create a new dir
- lfs_dir_fetch - load and check a dir pair from disk
- lfs_dir_commit - save a dir pair to disk
- lfs_dir_shift - shrink a dir pair to disk
- lfs_dir_append - add a dir entry, creating dirs if needed
- lfs_dir_remove - remove a dir entry, dropping dirs if needed
Additionally, followed through with a few other tweaks
