Commit Graph

509 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christopher Haster
8e251dd675 Merge pull request #1110 from Ryan-CW-Code/perf_gc
perf: gc might try to populate the lookahead buffer each time
2025-06-30 11:39:17 -05:00
ryancw
d5a86fd28d style: format code, limit to 80 columns. 2025-06-03 09:46:59 +08:00
ryancw
2349ac8c96 perf: gc might try to populate the lookahead buffer each time 2025-05-28 10:23:47 +08:00
ryancw
0755b00c21 refactor: value stored to 'diff' is never read 2025-05-27 20:00:29 +08:00
Christopher Haster
8c458fa6bd Merge pull request #1094 from sosthene-nitrokey/shrink-fs
Add support for shrinking a filesystem
2025-05-13 00:45:32 -05:00
Sosthène Guédon
edaaaf88ea Apply review comments 2025-05-07 10:38:43 +02:00
Sosthène Guédon
7d79423972 Rename SHRINKIFCHEAP to SHRINKNONRELOCATING 2025-05-07 10:34:24 +02:00
Sosthène Guédon
9b8f802b43 fixup! Add support for shrinking a filesystem 2025-05-05 11:37:39 +02:00
Christopher Haster
a3d6bec5f0 Fixed a double deorphan caused by relocation mid dir remove
Long story short: There is a specific case where removing a directory
can trigger a deorphan pass, but lfs_remove did not check for this,
would try to clean up the (already cleaned) directory orphan, and
trigger an assert:

  lfs.c:4890:assert: assert failed with false, expected eq true
      LFS_ASSERT(lfs_tag_size(lfs->gstate.tag) > 0x000 || orphans >= 0);

The specific case being a remove commit that triggers a relocation that
creates an orphan.

This is also possible in lfs_rename, but only if you're renaming a
directory that implies a remove, which is a pretty rare operation.

---

This was probably an oversight introduced in the non-recursive commit
logic rework.

Fortunately the fix is to just check if we even have an orphan before
trying to remove it. We can rely on this instead of the file type, so
this fix shouldn't even increase the code size.

Found and root-caused by Hugh-Baoa
2025-05-03 18:13:19 -05:00
Sosthène Guédon
2105e502c5 Add support for shrinking a filesystem
This PR adds a new `lfs_fs_shrink`, which functions similarly to
`lfs_fs_grow`, but supports reducing the block count.

This functions first checks that none of the removed block are in use.
If it is the case, it will fail.
2025-04-17 10:07:37 +02:00
Christopher Haster
8ed63b27be Merge pull request #1084 from elupus/fix/packing
fix: avoid assuming struct packing
2025-03-20 01:26:11 -05:00
Christopher Haster
47e738b788 Merge pull request #1071 from RocLoong/patch-1
print lfs_file_size overflow
2025-03-20 01:25:33 -05:00
Christopher Haster
63ab1ffb65 Merge pull request #1068 from littlefs-project/fix-dir-remove-read
Fix dir iteration being broken by concurrent removes
2025-03-20 01:24:04 -05:00
Christopher Haster
61a1b0b496 Tweaked lfs_gstate_iszero for terseness 2025-03-18 02:39:28 -05:00
Joakim Plate
ffafb9cbb1 fix: avoid assuming struct packing
lfs_gstate_t was assumed to be a packed array of uint32_t,
but this is not always guaranteed. Access the fields directly
instead of attempting to loop over an array of uint32_t

Fixes clang tidy warnings about use of uninitialized memory
accessed.
2025-03-14 10:03:46 +01:00
Rocloong
936919d134 LFS_TRACE: Fixed sign mismatch in lfs_file_size 2025-02-13 15:46:39 -06:00
Christopher Haster
caba4f31df Fixed dir iteration being broken by concurrent removes
When removing a file, we mark all open handles as "removed" (
pair={-1,-1}) to avoid trying to later read metadata that no longer
exists. Unfortunately, this also includes open dir handles that happen
to be pointing at the removed file, causing them to return
LFS_ERR_CORRUPT on the next read.

The good news is this is _not_ actual filesystem corruption, only a
logic error in lfs_dir_read.

We actually already have logic in place to nudge the dir to the next id,
but it was unreachable with the existing logic. I suspect this worked at
one point but was broken during a refactor due to lack of testing.

---

Fortunately, all we need to do is _not_ clobber the handle if the
internal type is a dir. Then the dir-nudging logic can correctly take
over.

I've also added test_dirs_remove_read to test this and prevent another
regression, adapted from tests provided by tpwrules that identified the
original bug.

Found by tpwrules
2025-02-03 22:52:24 -06:00
Amilcar Ubiera
152d03043c Fix for "unsafe use of type bool" warning when compiling with MSVC. 2025-02-03 18:59:14 -05:00
Christopher Haster
366100b140 Fixed incorrect cache reuse when seeking from end-of-block
In v2.5, we introduced an optimization to avoid rereading data when
seeking inside the file cache. Unfortunately this used a slightly
wrong condition to check if the cache was "live", which meant seeks from
end-of-blocks could end up with invalid caches and wrong data. Not
great.

The problem is the nuance of when a file's cache is "live":

1. The file is marked as LFS_F_READING or LFS_F_WRITING.

   But we can't reuse the cache when writing, so we only care about
   LFS_F_READING.

2. file->off != lfs->cfg->block_size (end-of-block).

   This is an optimization to avoid eagerly reading blocks we may not
   actually care about.

We weren't checking for the end-of-block case, which meant if you seeked
_from_ the end of a block to a seemingly valid location in the file
cache, you could end up with an invalid cache.

Note that end-of-block may not be powers-of-two due to CTZ skip-list
pointers.

---

The fix is to check for the end-of-block case in lfs_file_seek. Note
this now matches the need-new-block logic in lfs_file_flushedread.

This logic change may also make lfs_file_seek call lfs_file_flush more
often, but only in cases where lfs_file_flush is a noop.

I've also extended the test_seek tests to cover a few more boundary-read
cases and prevent a regression in the future.

Found by wjl and lrodorigo
2024-12-19 02:39:10 -06:00
Dong Wang
469c863c18 Assert on NULL IO function 2024-12-10 22:54:54 +08:00
Christopher Haster
2fcecc8894 Merge pull request #1046 from littlefs-project/fix-trailing-slashes
paths: Revisit path parsing, fix trailing slash behavior
2024-12-06 13:48:26 -06:00
Christopher Haster
83fe41b605 Merge pull request #1031 from littlefs-project/fix-enospc-issues
Fix metadata_max==prog_size commit->end calculation
2024-12-06 13:47:36 -06:00
Christopher Haster
d7a911923b Merge pull request #1027 from littlefs-project/fix-seek-overflow-ub
Fix seek undefined behavior on signed integer overflow
2024-12-06 13:47:20 -06:00
Christopher Haster
2ba4280a5e Merge pull request #997 from littlefs-project/fix-trace-format-again
Fix some more LFS_TRACE format specifiers
2024-12-06 13:47:06 -06:00
Christopher Haster
999ef6656f paths: Changed CREAT with a trailing slash to return NOTDIR
- before: lfs_file_open("missing/") => LFS_ERR_ISDIR
- after:  lfs_file_open("missing/") => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR

As noted by bmcdonnell-fb, returning LFS_ERR_ISDIR here was inconsistent
with the case where the file exists:

  case                           before          after
  lfs_file_open("dir_a")      => LFS_ERR_ISDIR   LFS_ERR_ISDIR
  lfs_file_open("dir_a/")     => LFS_ERR_ISDIR   LFS_ERR_ISDIR
  lfs_file_open("reg_a/")     => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR  LFS_ERR_NOTDIR
  lfs_file_open("missing_a/") => LFS_ERR_ISDIR   LFS_ERR_NOTDIR

Note this is consistent with the behavior of lfs_stat:

  lfs_file_open("reg_a/") => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR
  lfs_stat("reg_a/")      => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR

And the only other function that can "create" files, lfs_rename:

  lfs_file_open("missing_a/")       => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR
  lfs_rename("reg_a", "missing_a/") => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR

There is some ongoing discussion about if these should return NOTDIR,
ISDIR, or INVAL, but this is at least an improvement over the
rename/open mismatch.
2024-11-25 15:40:44 -06:00
Christopher Haster
80ca1ea300 paths: Reject empty paths
Before this, the empty path ("") was treated as an alias for the root.
This was unintentional and just a side-effect of how the path parser
worked.

Now, the empty path should always result in LFS_ERR_INVAL:

- before: lfs_stat("") => 0
- after:  lfs_stat("") => LFS_ERR_INVAL
2024-11-25 15:40:15 -06:00
Christopher Haster
815f0d85a5 paths: Fixed dots followed by dotdots
Unlike normal files, dots (".") should not change the depth when
attempting to skip dotdot ("..") entries.

A weird nuance in the path parser, but at least it had a relatively easy
fix.

Added test_paths_dot_dotdots to prevent a regression.
2024-11-25 15:40:15 -06:00
Christopher Haster
dc92dec6d3 paths: Reject dotdots above root
This changes the behavior of paths that attempt to navigate above root
to now return LFS_ERR_INVAL:

- before: lfs_stat("/../a") => 0
- after:  lfs_stat("/../a") => LFS_ERR_INVAL

This is a bit of an opinionated change while making other path
resolution tweaks.

In terms of POSIX-compatibility, it's a bit unclear exactly what dotdots
above the root should do.

POSIX notes:

> As a special case, in the root directory, dot-dot may refer to the
> root directory itself.

But the word choice of "may" implies it is up to the implementation.

I originally implement this as a root-loop simply because that is what
my Linux machine does, but I now think that's not the best option. Since
we're making other path-related tweaks, we might as well try to adopt
behavior that is, in my opinion, safer and less... weird...

This should also help make paths more consistent with future theoretical
openat-list APIs, where saturating at the current directory is sort of
the least expected behavior.
2024-11-25 15:40:07 -06:00
Christopher Haster
a6035071be paths: Fixed/doc trailing slash/dot POSIX incompatibilities
- lfs_mkdir now accepts trailing slashes:
  - before: lfs_mkdir("a/") => LFS_ERR_NOENT
  - after:  lfs_mkdir("a/") => 0

- lfs_stat, lfs_getattr, etc, now reject trailing slashes if the file is
  not a directory:
  - before: lfs_stat("reg_a/") => 0
  - after:  lfs_stat("reg_a/") => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR

  Note trailing slashes are accepted if the file is a directory:
  - before: lfs_stat("dir_a/") => 0
  - after:  lfs_stat("dir_a/") => 0

- lfs_file_open now returns LFS_ERR_NOTDIR if the file exists but the
  path contains trailing slashes:
  - before: lfs_file_open("reg_a/") => LFS_ERR_NOENT
  - after:  lfs_file_open("reg_a/") => LFS_ERR_NOTDIR

To make these work, the internal lfs_dir_find API required some
interesting changes:

- lfs_dir_find no longer sets id=0x3ff on not finding a parent entry in
  the path. Instead, lfs_path_islast can be used to determine if the
  modified path references a parent entry or child entry based on the
  remainder of the path string.

  Note this is only necessary for functions that create new entries
  (lfs_mkdir, lfs_rename, lfs_file_open).

- Trailing slashes mean we can no longer rely on the modified path being
  NULL-terminated. lfs_path_namelen provides an alternative to strlen
  that stops at slash or NULL.

- lfs_path_isdir also tells you if the modified path must reference a
  dir (contains trailing slashes). I considered handling this entirely
  in lfs_dir_find, but the behavior of entry-creating functions is too
  nuanced.

  At least lfs_dir_find returns LFS_ERR_NOTDIR if the file exists on
  disk.

Like strlen, lfs_path_namelen/islast/isdir are all O(n) where n is the
name length. This isn't great, but if you're using filenames large
enough for this to actually matter... uh... open an issue on GitHub and
we might improve this in the future.

---

There are a couple POSIX incompatibilities that I think are not
worth fixing:

- Root modifications return EINVAL instead of EBUSY:
  - littlefs: remove("/") => EINVAL
  - POSIX:    remove("/") => EBUSY
  Reason: This would be the only use of EBUSY in the system.

- We accept modifications of directories with trailing dots:
  - littlefs: remove("a/.") => 0
  - POSIX:    remove("a/.") => EBUSY
  Reason: Not worth implementing.

- We do not check for existence of directories followed by dotdots:
  - littlefs: stat("a/missing/..") => 0
  - POSIX:    stat("a/missing/..") => ENOENT
  Reason: Difficult to implement non-recursively.

- We accept modifications of directories with trailing dotdots:
  - littlefs: rename("a/b/..", "c") => 0
  - POSIX:    rename("a/b/..", "c") => EBUSY
  Reason: Not worth implementing.

These are at least now documented in tests/test_paths.toml, which isn't
the greatest location, but it's at least something until a better
document is created.

Note that these don't really belong in SPEC.md because path parsing is
a function of the driver and has no impact on disk.
2024-11-25 15:39:29 -06:00
Christopher Haster
ea431bd6ae Added some checks that metadata_max makes sense
Like the read/prog/block_size checks, these are just asserts. If these
invariants are broken the filesystem will break in surprising ways.
2024-10-04 13:45:57 -05:00
Christopher Haster
2d62d2f4c9 Fixed metadata_max==prog_size commit->end calculation
The inconsistency here between the use of block_size vs metadata_max was
suspicious. Turns out there's a bug when metadata_max == prog_size.

We correctly use metadata_max for the block_size/2 check, but we weren't
using it for the block_size-40 check. The second check seems unnecessary
after the first, but it protects against running out of space in a
commit for commit-related metadata (checksums, tail pointers, etc) when
we can't program half-blocks.

Turns out this is also needed when limiting metadata_max to a single
prog, otherwise we risk erroring with LFS_ERR_NOSPC early.

Found by ajheck, dpkristensen, NLLK, and likely others.
2024-10-04 13:45:43 -05:00
wdfk-prog
a2c2e49e6b Write the detect cycles function as a function to optimize code 2024-10-04 10:37:25 +08:00
Christopher Haster
abaec45652 Fixed seek undefined behavior on signed integer overflow
In the previous implementation of lfs_file_seek, we calculated the new
offset using signed arithmetic before checking for possible
overflow/underflow conditions. This results in undefined behavior in C.

Fortunately for us, littlefs is now limited to 31-bit file sizes for API
reasons, so we don't have to be too clever here. Doing the arithmetic
with unsigned integers and just checking if we're in a valid range
afterwards should work.

Found by m-kostrzewa and lucic71
2024-09-24 14:01:20 -05:00
Christopher Haster
ac207586ba Fixed some more LFS_TRACE format specifiers
- block_cycles is signed and should use PRId32
- flags is signed (which is a bit weird) and should be cast for %x

Unfortunately exactly what PRI* expands to is dependant on both the
compiler and the underlying architecture, so I don't think it's possible
for us to catch these mistakes with CI...

Found by stefano-zanotti
2024-06-25 16:08:00 -05:00
Christopher Haster
6e52140d51 Merge pull request #959 from littlefs-project/fix-expanded-magic
Duplicate the superblock entry during superblock expansion, fix missing magic
2024-04-29 14:26:38 -05:00
Brian Pugh
749a45650f Fix DivideByZero exception when filesystem is completely full. 2024-04-16 20:32:12 -07:00
Christopher Haster
11b036cc6c Prevented unnecessary superblock rewrites if old version in superblock chain
Because multiple, out-of-date superblocks can exist in our superblock
chain, we need to be careful to make sure newer superblock entries
override older superblock entries.

If we see an older on-disk minor version in the superblock chain, we
were correctly overriding the on-disk minor version, but we were also
leaving the "needs superblock" bit set in our consistency state.

This isn't a hard-error, but would lead to a superblock rewrite every
mount. The rewrite would make no progress, as the out-of-date version is
effectively immutable at this point, and just waste prog cycles.

This should fix that by clearing the "needs superblock" bit if we see a
newer on-disk minor version.
2024-03-19 00:49:28 -05:00
Christopher Haster
a60a986c9c Duplicate the superblock entry during superblock expansion
The documentation does not match the implementation here. The intended
behavior of superblock expansion was to duplicate the current superblock
entry into the new superblock:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|littlefs|->|littlefs|
  ||bs=4096 | ||bs=4096 |
  ||bc=256  | ||bc=256  |
  ||crc32   | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

The main benefit is that we can rely on the magic string "littlefs"
always residing in blocks 0x{0,1}, even if the superblock chain has
multiple superblocks.

The downside is that earlier superblocks in the superblock chain may
contain out-of-date configuration. This is a bit annoying, and risks
hard-to-reach bugs, but in theory shouldn't break anything as long as
the filesystem is aware of this.

Unfortunately this was lost at some point during refactoring in the
early v2-alpha work. A lot of code was moving around in this stage, so
it's a bit hard to track down the change and if it was intentional. The
result is superblock expansion creates a valid linked-list of
superblocks, but only the last superblock contains a valid superblock
entry:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|crc32   |->|littlefs|
  ||        | ||bs=4096 |
  ||        | ||bc=256  |
  ||        | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

What's interesting is this isn't invalid as far as lfs_mount is
concerned. lfs_mount is happy as long as a superblock entry exists
anywhere in the superblock chain. This is good for compat flexibility,
but is the main reason this has gone unnoticed for so long.

---

With the benefit of more time to think about the problem, it may have
been more preferable to copy only the "littlefs" magic string and NOT
the superblock entry:

   .--------.  .--------.
  .|littlefs|->|littlefs|
  ||crc32c  | ||bs=4096 |
  ||        | ||bc=256  |
  ||        | ||root dir|
  ||        | ||crc32   |
  |'--------' |'--------'
  '--------'  '--------'

This would allow for simple "littlefs" magic string checks without the
risks associated with out-of-date superblock entries.

Unfortunately the current implementation errors if it finds a "littlefs"
magic string without an associated superblock entry, so such a change
would not be compatible with old drivers.

---

This commit tweaks superblock expansion to duplicate the superblock
entry instead of simply moving it to the new superblock. And adds tests
over the magic string "littlefs" both before and after superblock
expansion.

Found by rojer and Nikola Kosturski
2024-03-19 00:48:56 -05:00
Christopher Haster
4dd30c1b8f Merge pull request #948 from littlefs-project/fix-sync-ordering
Fix sync issue where data writes could appear before metadata writes
2024-03-08 16:49:59 -06:00
Christopher Haster
6352185949 Fixed sync issue where data writes could appear before metadata writes
Long story short we aren't calling sync correctly in littlefs. This
fixes that.

Some forms of storage, mainly anything with an FTL, eMMC, SD, etc, do
not guarantee a strict write order for writes to different blocks. In
theory this is what bd sync is for, to tell the bd when it is important
for the writes to be ordered.

Currently, littlefs calls bd sync after committing metadata. This is
useful as it ensures that user code can rely on lfs_file_sync for
ordering external side-effects.

But this is insufficient for handling storage with out-of-order writes.

Consider the simple case of a file with one data block:

1. lfs_file_write(blablabla) => writes data into a new data block

2. lfs_file_sync() => commits metadata to point to the new data block

But with out-of-order writes, the bd is free to reorder things such that
the metadata is updated _before_ the data is written. If we lose power,
that would be bad.

The solution to this is to call bd sync twice: Once before we commit
the metadata to tell the bd that these writes must be ordered, and once
after we commit the metadata to allow ordering with user code.

As a small optimization, we only call bd sync if the current file is not
inlined and has actually been modified (LFS_F_DIRTY). It's possible for
inlined files to be interleaved with writes to other files.

Found by MFaehling and alex31
2024-02-27 14:00:10 -06:00
Christopher Haster
ddbfcaa722 Fixed synthetic move underflows in lfs_dir_get
By "luck" the previous code somehow managed to not be broken, though it
was possible to traverse the same file twice in lfs_fs_traverse/size
(which is not an error).

The problem was an underlying assumption in lfs_dir_get that it would
never be called when the requested id is pending removal because of a
powerloss. The assumption was either:

1. lfs_dir_find would need to be called first to find the id, and it
   would correctly toss out pending-rms with LFS_ERR_NOENT.

2. lfs_fs_mkconsistent would be implicitly called before any filesystem
   traversals, cleaning up any pending-rms. This is at least true for
   allocator scans.

But, as noted by andriyndev, both lfs_fs_traverse and lfs_fs_size can
call lfs_fs_get with a pending-rm id if called in a readonly context.

---

By "luck" this somehow manages to not break anything:

1. If the pending-rm id is >0, the id is decremented by 1 in lfs_fs_get,
   returning the previous file entry during traversal. Worst case, this
   reports any blocks owned by the previous file entry twice.

   Note this is not an error, lfs_fs_traverse/size may return the same
   block multiple times due to underlying copy-on-write structures.

2. More concerning, if the pending-rm id is 0, the id is decremented by
   1 in lfs_fs_get and underflows. This underflow propagates into the
   type field of the tag we are searching for, decrementing it from
   0x200 (LFS_TYPE_STRUCT) to 0x1ff (LFS_TYPE_INTERNAL(UNUSED)).

   Fortunately, since this happens to underflow to the INTERNAL tag
   type, the type intended to never exist on disk, we should never find
   a matching tag during our lfs_fs_get search. The result? lfs_dir_get
   returns LFS_ERR_NOENT, which is actually what we want.

Also note that LFS_ERR_NOENT does not terminate the mdir traversal
early. If it did we would have missed files instead of duplicating
files, which is a slightly worse situation.

---

The fix is to add an explicit check for pending-rms in lfs_dir_get, just
like in lfs_dir_find. This avoids relying on unintended underflow
propagation, and should make the internal API behavior more consistent.

This is especially important for potential future gc extensions.

Found by andriyndev
2024-02-04 15:12:31 -06:00
Christopher Haster
a70870c628 Renamed internal functions _raw* -> _*_
So instead of lfs_file_rawopencfg, it's now lfs_file_opencfg_.

The "raw" prefix is annoying, doesn't really add meaning ("internal"
would have been better), and gets in the way of finding the relevant
function implementations.

I have been using _s as suffixes for unimportant name collisions in
other codebases, and it seems to work well at reducing wasted brain
cycles naming things. Adopting it here avoids the need for "raw"
prefixes.

It's quite a bit like the use of prime symbols to resolve name
collisions in math, e.g. x' = x + 1. Which is even supported in Haskell
and is quite nice there.

And the main benefit: Now if you search for the public API name, you get
the internal function first, which is probably what you care about.

Here is the exact script:

  sed -i 's/_raw\([a-z0-9_]*\)\>/_\1_/g' $(git ls-tree -r HEAD --name-only | grep '.*\.c')
2024-01-19 13:20:56 -06:00
Christopher Haster
ceb17a0f4a Merge pull request #917 from tomscii/fix_return_value_of_lfs_rename
Fix return value of lfs_rename()
2024-01-19 13:19:21 -06:00
Christopher Haster
8b8fd14187 Added inline_max, to optionally limit the size of inlined files
Inlined files live in metadata and decrease storage requirements, but
may be limited to improve metadata-related performance. This is
especially important given the current plague of metadata performance.

Though decreasing inline_max may make metadata more dense and increase
block usage, so it's important to benchmark if optimizing for speed.

The underlying limits of inlined files haven't changed:
1. Inlined files need to fit in RAM, so <= cache_size
2. Inlined files need to fit in a single attr, so <= attr_max
3. Inlined files need to fit in 1/8 of a block to avoid metadata
   overflow issues, this is after limiting by metadata_max,
   so <= min(metadata_max, block_size)/8

By default, the largest possible inline_max is used. This preserves
backwards compatibility and is probably a good default for most use
cases.

This does have the awkward effect of requiring inline_max=-1 to
indicate disabled inlined files, but I don't think there's a good
way around this.
2024-01-19 13:00:27 -06:00
Christopher Haster
09972a1710 Merge pull request #913 from littlefs-project/gc-compactions
Extend lfs_fs_gc to compact metadata, compact_thresh
2024-01-19 12:51:11 -06:00
Christopher Haster
ed7bd05435 Merge pull request #912 from littlefs-project/relaxed-lookahead
Relaxed lookahead alignment, other internal block alloc readability improvements
2024-01-19 12:27:14 -06:00
Christopher Haster
b5cd957f42 Extended lfs_fs_gc to compact metadata, compact_thresh
This extends lfs_fs_gc to now handle three things:

1. Calls mkconsistent if not already consistent
2. Compacts metadata > compact_thresh
3. Populates the block allocator

Which should be all of the janitorial work that can be done without
additional on-disk data structures.

Normally, metadata compaction occurs when an mdir is full, and results in
mdirs that are at most block_size/2.

Now, if you call lfs_fs_gc, littlefs will eagerly compact any mdirs that
exceed the compact_thresh configuration option. Because the resulting
mdirs are at most block_size/2, it only makes sense for compact_thresh to
be >= block_size/2 and <= block_size.

Additionally, there are some special values:

- compact_thresh=0  => defaults to ~88% block_size, may change
- compact_thresh=-1 => disables metadata compaction during lfs_fs_gc

Note that compact_thresh only affects lfs_fs_gc. Normal compactions
still only occur when full.
2024-01-19 12:25:45 -06:00
Christopher Haster
1711bdef76 Merge pull request #886 from BrianPugh/macro-sanity-check
Add value-range checks for user-definable macros at compile-time
2024-01-19 12:23:36 -06:00
Tom Szilagyi
4f32738cd6 Fix return value of lfs_rename()
When lfs_rename() is called trying to rename (move) a file to an
existing directory, LFS_ERR_ISDIR is (correctly) returned. However, in
the opposite case, if one tries to rename (move) a directory to a path
currently occupied by a regular file, LFS_ERR_NOTDIR should be
returned (since the error is that the destination is NOT a directory),
but in reality, LFS_ERR_ISDIR is returned in this case as well.

This commit fixes the code so that in the latter case, LFS_ERR_NOTDIR
is returned.
2024-01-17 00:06:52 -06:00
Christopher Haster
6691718b18 Restricted LFS_FILE_MAX to signed 32-bits, <2^31, <=2147483647
I think realistically no one is using this. It's already only partially
supported and untested.

Worst case, if someone does depend on this we can always revert.
2024-01-16 23:40:30 -06:00