mirror of
https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs.git
synced 2025-12-29 18:40:35 +00:00
051bf66f9a
With this, we apply the same result modifiers (exprs/defines/hot/etc) to both the input results and -d/--diff results. So if both start with the same format, diffing/hotifying/etc should work as expected. This is really the only way I can seen -d/--diff results working with result modifiers in a way that makes sense. The downside of this is that you can't save results with some complex operation applied, and then diff while applying the same operation, since most of the newer operations (hotify) are _not_ idempotent. Fortunately the two alternatives are not unreasonable: 1. Save results _without_ the operation applied, since the operation will be applied to both the input and diff results. This is a bit asymmetric, but should work. 2. Apply the operation to the input and then pipe to csv.py for diffing. This used to "just work" when we did _not_ apply operations to output csv/json, but this was really just equivalent to 1.. I think the moral of the story is you can solve any problem with enough chained csv.py calls.