mirror of
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-12-26 09:08:59 +00:00
[gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 1
When running test-case gdb.base/vfork-follow-parent.exp on powerpc64 (likewise
on s390x), I run into:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/vfork-follow-parent.exp: \
exec_file=vfork-follow-parent-exit: target-non-stop=on: non-stop=off: \
resolution_method=schedule-multiple: print unblock_parent = 1
continue^M
Continuing.^M
Reading symbols from vfork-follow-parent-exit...^M
^M
^M
Fatal signal: Segmentation fault^M
----- Backtrace -----^M
0x1027d3e7 gdb_internal_backtrace_1^M
src/gdb/bt-utils.c:122^M
0x1027d54f _Z22gdb_internal_backtracev^M
src/gdb/bt-utils.c:168^M
0x1057643f handle_fatal_signal^M
src/gdb/event-top.c:889^M
0x10576677 handle_sigsegv^M
src/gdb/event-top.c:962^M
0x3fffa7610477 ???^M
0x103f2144 for_each_block^M
src/gdb/dcache.c:199^M
0x103f235b _Z17dcache_invalidateP13dcache_struct^M
src/gdb/dcache.c:251^M
0x10bde8c7 _Z24target_dcache_invalidatev^M
src/gdb/target-dcache.c:50^M
...
or similar.
The root cause for the segmentation fault is that linux_is_uclinux gives an
incorrect result: it should always return false, given that we're running on a
regular linux system, but instead it returns first true, then false.
In more detail, the segmentation fault happens as follows:
- a program space with an address space is created
- a second program space is about to be created. maybe_new_address_space
is called, and because linux_is_uclinux returns true, maybe_new_address_space
returns false, and no new address space is created
- a second program space with the same address space is created
- a program space is deleted. Because linux_is_uclinux now returns false,
gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (current_inferior ()->arch ()) returns
false, and the address space is deleted
- when gdb uses the address space of the remaining program space, we run into
the segfault, because the address space is deleted.
Hardcoding linux_is_uclinux to false makes the test-case pass.
We leave addressing the root cause for the following commit in this series.
For now, prevent the segmentation fault by making the address space a refcounted
object.
This was already suggested here [1]:
...
A better solution might be to have the address spaces be reference counted
...
Tested on top of trunk on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux.
Tested on top of gdb-14-branch on ppc64-linux.
Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
PR gdb/30547
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30547
[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-October/202928.html
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ one_breakpoint_xfer_memory (gdb_byte *readbuf, gdb_byte *writebuf,
|
||||
int bptoffset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!breakpoint_address_match (target_info->placed_address_space, 0,
|
||||
current_program_space->aspace, 0))
|
||||
current_program_space->aspace.get (), 0))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* The breakpoint is inserted in a different address space. */
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@ should_be_inserted (struct bp_location *bl)
|
||||
a breakpoint. */
|
||||
if ((bl->loc_type == bp_loc_software_breakpoint
|
||||
|| bl->loc_type == bp_loc_hardware_breakpoint)
|
||||
&& stepping_past_instruction_at (bl->pspace->aspace,
|
||||
&& stepping_past_instruction_at (bl->pspace->aspace.get (),
|
||||
bl->address)
|
||||
/* The single-step breakpoint may be inserted at the location
|
||||
we're trying to step if the instruction branches to itself.
|
||||
@@ -2847,7 +2847,7 @@ insert_bp_location (struct bp_location *bl,
|
||||
read the breakpoint instead of returning the data saved in
|
||||
the breakpoint location's shadow contents. */
|
||||
bl->target_info.reqstd_address = bl->address;
|
||||
bl->target_info.placed_address_space = bl->pspace->aspace;
|
||||
bl->target_info.placed_address_space = bl->pspace->aspace.get ();
|
||||
bl->target_info.length = bl->length;
|
||||
|
||||
/* When working with target-side conditions, we must pass all the conditions
|
||||
@@ -4429,7 +4429,7 @@ bp_location_inserted_here_p (const struct bp_location *bl,
|
||||
const address_space *aspace, CORE_ADDR pc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (bl->inserted
|
||||
&& breakpoint_address_match (bl->pspace->aspace, bl->address,
|
||||
&& breakpoint_address_match (bl->pspace->aspace.get (), bl->address,
|
||||
aspace, pc))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* An unmapped overlay can't be a match. */
|
||||
@@ -4508,7 +4508,7 @@ hardware_watchpoint_inserted_in_range (const address_space *aspace,
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
for (bp_location &loc : bpt.locations ())
|
||||
if (loc.pspace->aspace == aspace && loc.inserted)
|
||||
if (loc.pspace->aspace.get () == aspace && loc.inserted)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CORE_ADDR l, h;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7327,10 +7327,10 @@ breakpoint_location_address_match (struct bp_location *bl,
|
||||
const address_space *aspace,
|
||||
CORE_ADDR addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (breakpoint_address_match (bl->pspace->aspace, bl->address,
|
||||
return (breakpoint_address_match (bl->pspace->aspace.get (), bl->address,
|
||||
aspace, addr)
|
||||
|| (bl->length
|
||||
&& breakpoint_address_match_range (bl->pspace->aspace,
|
||||
&& breakpoint_address_match_range (bl->pspace->aspace.get (),
|
||||
bl->address, bl->length,
|
||||
aspace, addr)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -7347,7 +7347,7 @@ breakpoint_location_address_range_overlap (struct bp_location *bl,
|
||||
CORE_ADDR addr, int len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (gdbarch_has_global_breakpoints (current_inferior ()->arch ())
|
||||
|| bl->pspace->aspace == aspace)
|
||||
|| bl->pspace->aspace.get () == aspace)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int bl_len = bl->length != 0 ? bl->length : 1;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7404,8 +7404,10 @@ breakpoint_locations_match (const struct bp_location *loc1,
|
||||
/* We compare bp_location.length in order to cover ranged
|
||||
breakpoints. Keep this in sync with
|
||||
bp_location_is_less_than. */
|
||||
return (breakpoint_address_match (loc1->pspace->aspace, loc1->address,
|
||||
loc2->pspace->aspace, loc2->address)
|
||||
return (breakpoint_address_match (loc1->pspace->aspace.get (),
|
||||
loc1->address,
|
||||
loc2->pspace->aspace.get (),
|
||||
loc2->address)
|
||||
&& (loc1->loc_type == loc2->loc_type || sw_hw_bps_match)
|
||||
&& loc1->length == loc2->length);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -9565,8 +9567,9 @@ ranged_breakpoint::breakpoint_hit (const struct bp_location *bl,
|
||||
|| ws.sig () != GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return breakpoint_address_match_range (bl->pspace->aspace, bl->address,
|
||||
bl->length, aspace, bp_addr);
|
||||
return breakpoint_address_match_range (bl->pspace->aspace.get (),
|
||||
bl->address, bl->length, aspace,
|
||||
bp_addr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Implement the "resources_needed" method for ranged breakpoints. */
|
||||
@@ -12012,7 +12015,7 @@ code_breakpoint::breakpoint_hit (const struct bp_location *bl,
|
||||
|| ws.sig () != GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!breakpoint_address_match (bl->pspace->aspace, bl->address,
|
||||
if (!breakpoint_address_match (bl->pspace->aspace.get (), bl->address,
|
||||
aspace, bp_addr))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user