From 91b310a0a897b21d385b60266aea289da3f0aba5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 20:40:08 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] gdbserver: regcache: Update comment in supply_regblock Since commit 84da4a1ea0ae ("gdbserver: refactor the definition and uses of supply_regblock") there is no case where supply_regblock is passed a nullptr for the BUF argument, and there is even a gdb_assert to make sure of it. Therefore remove that part of the documentation comment. --- gdbserver/regcache.cc | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdbserver/regcache.cc b/gdbserver/regcache.cc index c08c9ae06c1..96855f03c3e 100644 --- a/gdbserver/regcache.cc +++ b/gdbserver/regcache.cc @@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ supply_register_by_name_zeroed (struct regcache *regcache, #endif /* Supply the whole register set whose contents are stored in BUF, to - REGCACHE. If BUF is NULL, all the registers' values are recorded - as unavailable. */ + REGCACHE. */ void supply_regblock (struct regcache *regcache, const void *buf)