mirror of
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-12-25 16:57:52 +00:00
gdb: pass frames as const frame_info_ptr &
We currently pass frames to function by value, as `frame_info_ptr`.
This is somewhat expensive:
- the size of `frame_info_ptr` is 64 bytes, which is a bit big to pass
by value
- the constructors and destructor link/unlink the object in the global
`frame_info_ptr::frame_list` list. This is an `intrusive_list`, so
it's not so bad: it's just assigning a few points, there's no memory
allocation as if it was `std::list`, but still it's useless to do
that over and over.
As suggested by Tom Tromey, change many function signatures to accept
`const frame_info_ptr &` instead of `frame_info_ptr`.
Some functions reassign their `frame_info_ptr` parameter, like:
void
the_func (frame_info_ptr frame)
{
for (; frame != nullptr; frame = get_prev_frame (frame))
{
...
}
}
I wondered what to do about them, do I leave them as-is or change them
(and need to introduce a separate local variable that can be
re-assigned). I opted for the later for consistency. It might not be
clear why some functions take `const frame_info_ptr &` while others take
`frame_info_ptr`. Also, if a function took a `frame_info_ptr` because
it did re-assign its parameter, I doubt that we would think to change it
to `const frame_info_ptr &` should the implementation change such that
it doesn't need to take `frame_info_ptr` anymore. It seems better to
have a simple rule and apply it everywhere.
Change-Id: I59d10addef687d157f82ccf4d54f5dde9a963fd0
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11720,7 +11720,7 @@ ada_exception_support_info_sniffer (void)
|
||||
to most users. */
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
is_known_support_routine (frame_info_ptr frame)
|
||||
is_known_support_routine (const frame_info_ptr &frame)
|
||||
{
|
||||
enum language func_lang;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
@@ -11779,9 +11779,9 @@ is_known_support_routine (frame_info_ptr frame)
|
||||
part of the Ada run-time, starting from FI and moving upward. */
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
ada_find_printable_frame (frame_info_ptr fi)
|
||||
ada_find_printable_frame (const frame_info_ptr &initial_fi)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (; fi != NULL; fi = get_prev_frame (fi))
|
||||
for (frame_info_ptr fi = initial_fi; fi != nullptr; fi = get_prev_frame (fi))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!is_known_support_routine (fi))
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -12913,7 +12913,7 @@ ada_add_standard_exceptions (compiled_regex *preg,
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
ada_add_exceptions_from_frame (compiled_regex *preg,
|
||||
frame_info_ptr frame,
|
||||
const frame_info_ptr &frame,
|
||||
std::vector<ada_exc_info> *exceptions)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct block *block = get_frame_block (frame, 0);
|
||||
@@ -13339,7 +13339,7 @@ public:
|
||||
|
||||
struct value *read_var_value (struct symbol *var,
|
||||
const struct block *var_block,
|
||||
frame_info_ptr frame) const override
|
||||
const frame_info_ptr &frame) const override
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* The only case where default_read_var_value is not sufficient
|
||||
is when VAR is a renaming... */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user