mirror of
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-12-28 10:00:51 +00:00
2003-10-06 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* breakpoint.c, breakpoint.h: Remove obsolete code and comments. * buildsym.c, dbxread.c, gdbtypes.c, mdebugread.c: Ditto. * monitor.c, sparc-tdep.c, stabsread.c: Ditto. * stabsread.h, xcoffread.c: Ditto.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1245,11 +1245,11 @@ update_breakpoints_after_exec (void)
|
||||
automagically. Certainly on HP-UX that's true.
|
||||
|
||||
Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>: Actually, zero is a perfectly
|
||||
valid code address on some platforms (like the OBSOLETE mn10200
|
||||
and mn10300 simulators). We shouldn't assign any special
|
||||
interpretation to a breakpoint with a zero address. And in
|
||||
fact, GDB doesn't --- I can't see what that comment above is
|
||||
talking about. As far as I can tell, setting the address of a
|
||||
valid code address on some platforms (like the mn10300
|
||||
simulators). We shouldn't assign any special interpretation to
|
||||
a breakpoint with a zero address. And in fact, GDB doesn't ---
|
||||
I can't see what that comment above is talking about. As far
|
||||
as I can tell, setting the address of a
|
||||
bp_catch_exec/bp_catch_vfork/bp_catch_fork breakpoint to zero
|
||||
is meaningless, since those are implemented with HP-UX kernel
|
||||
hackery, not by storing breakpoint instructions somewhere. */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user