mirror of
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-12-06 07:33:08 +00:00
[gdb/build] Fix missing implicit constructor call with gcc 4.8
When building gdb on x86_64-linux with --enable-targets riscv64-suse-linux, I
run into:
...
src/gdb/arch/riscv.c:112:45: required from here
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/hashtable_policy.h:195:39: error: no matching \
function for call to 'std::pair<const riscv_gdbarch_features, const \
std::unique_ptr<target_desc, target_desc_deleter> >::pair(const \
riscv_gdbarch_features&, target_desc*&)'
: _M_v(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...) { }
^
...
for this code in riscv_lookup_target_description:
...
/* Add to the cache. */
riscv_tdesc_cache.emplace (features, tdesc);
...
Work around this compiler problem (filed as PR gcc/96537), similar to how that
was done in commit 6d0cf4464e "Fix build with gcc-4.8.x":
...
- riscv_tdesc_cache.emplace (features, tdesc);
+ riscv_tdesc_cache.emplace (features, target_desc_up (tdesc));
...
That is, call the target_desc_up constructor explictly instead of implicitly.
Also, work around a similar issue in get_thread_arch_aspace_regcache.
Build on x86_64-linux with --enable-targets riscv64-suse-linux, and
reg-tested.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-08-08 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR build/26344
* arch/riscv.c (riscv_lookup_target_description): Use an explicit
constructor.
* regcache.c (get_thread_arch_aspace_regcache): Same.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
|||||||
|
2020-08-08 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PR build/26344
|
||||||
|
* arch/riscv.c (riscv_lookup_target_description): Use an explicit
|
||||||
|
constructor.
|
||||||
|
* regcache.c (get_thread_arch_aspace_regcache): Same.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2020-08-07 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
|
2020-08-07 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* ravenscar-thread.c
|
* ravenscar-thread.c
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -108,8 +108,9 @@ riscv_lookup_target_description (const struct riscv_gdbarch_features features)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
target_desc *tdesc = riscv_create_target_description (features);
|
target_desc *tdesc = riscv_create_target_description (features);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Add to the cache. */
|
/* Add to the cache. Work around a problem with g++ 4.8 (PR96537):
|
||||||
riscv_tdesc_cache.emplace (features, tdesc);
|
Call the target_desc_up constructor explictly instead of implicitly. */
|
||||||
|
riscv_tdesc_cache.emplace (features, target_desc_up (tdesc));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return tdesc;
|
return tdesc;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -354,7 +354,9 @@ get_thread_arch_aspace_regcache (process_stratum_target *target,
|
|||||||
/* It does not exist, create it. */
|
/* It does not exist, create it. */
|
||||||
regcache *new_regcache = new regcache (target, arch, aspace);
|
regcache *new_regcache = new regcache (target, arch, aspace);
|
||||||
new_regcache->set_ptid (ptid);
|
new_regcache->set_ptid (ptid);
|
||||||
ptid_regc_map.insert (std::make_pair (ptid, new_regcache));
|
/* Work around a problem with g++ 4.8 (PR96537): Call the regcache_up
|
||||||
|
constructor explictly instead of implicitly. */
|
||||||
|
ptid_regc_map.insert (std::make_pair (ptid, regcache_up (new_regcache)));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return new_regcache;
|
return new_regcache;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user