Imagelibrary/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb.git synced 2025-12-29 02:20:51 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

* valops.c (hand_function_call): Replace #ifdef STACK_ALIGN with

Browse Source 
run-time test for STACK_ALIGN_P.
* gdbarch.sh: Add support for function and variable predicates.
(STACK_ALIGN): Add.  Implement with predicate - STACK_ALIGN_P.
* gdbarch.h, gdbarch.c: Re-generate.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cagney
2000-04-21 04:17:18 +00:00
parent 2f9429aea3
commit 2ada493ad1
5 changed files with 205 additions and 84 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

35
gdb/valops.c
View File

@@ -1534,14 +1534,14 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
arg_type = check_typedef (VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE (args[i]));
len = TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type);
#ifdef STACK_ALIGN
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code is
really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the stack in
a target-defined manner. */
aligned_len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
#else
aligned_len = len;
#endif
if (STACK_ALIGN_P ())
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this
stack_align code is really broken. Better to let
PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the stack in a target-defined
manner. */
aligned_len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
else
aligned_len = len;
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* stack grows downward */
@@ -1583,12 +1583,11 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
if (struct_return)
{
int len = TYPE_LENGTH (value_type);
#ifdef STACK_ALIGN
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code is
really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the stack in
a target-defined manner. */
len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
#endif
if (STACK_ALIGN_P ())
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align
code is really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust
the stack in a target-defined manner. */
len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* stack grows downward */
@@ -1609,11 +1608,10 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
hppa_push_arguments */
#ifndef NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED
#if defined(STACK_ALIGN)
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code is
really broken. Better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the stack in
a target-defined manner. */
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* If stack grows down, we must leave a hole at the top. */
int len = 0;
@@ -1624,7 +1622,6 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
len += CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST;
sp -= STACK_ALIGN (len) - len;
}
#endif /* STACK_ALIGN */
#endif /* NO_EXTRA_ALIGNMENT_NEEDED */
sp = PUSH_ARGUMENTS (nargs, args, sp, struct_return, struct_addr);
@@ -1642,8 +1639,7 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
sp = PUSH_RETURN_ADDRESS (real_pc, sp);
#endif /* PUSH_RETURN_ADDRESS */
#if defined(STACK_ALIGN)
if (!INNER_THAN (1, 2))
if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && !INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* If stack grows up, we must leave a hole at the bottom, note
that sp already has been advanced for the arguments! */
@@ -1651,7 +1647,6 @@ You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
sp += CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST;
sp = STACK_ALIGN (sp);
}
#endif /* STACK_ALIGN */
/* XXX This seems wrong. For stacks that grow down we shouldn't do
anything here! */